Useful for testing, but with details to improve
What do you like best about the product?
The most useful thing is being able to test on different browsers and operating systems without having to set up multiple environments. You save a lot of time on configurations. It is also practical for checking specific errors on devices you don't physically have. The interface is simple to use.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes remote sessions are slow or have some delay, which makes debugging more difficult. I've also had problems with loading certain heavy sites. And the prices are not the most affordable if you need to work with several testers or many parallel tests.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Primarily, it helps us validate the compatibility of our web applications across multiple browsers and operating systems without having to maintain a farm of devices or virtual machines. This reduces testing time, improves QA coverage, and allows us to detect errors that would normally go unnoticed. Additionally, it facilitates integration with CI/CD pipelines.
There are no comments to display