Hygraph
HygraphReviews from AWS customer
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
697 reviews
from
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Powerful for localized content aggregation and fast development
What do you like best about the product?
As an engineer, Hygraph shines in performance and developer ergonomics when granular API control and future integration with external systems are needed. Structured content modeling, localization, and especially content federation make a strong case when choosing a headless CMS. And the GraphQL-native architecture makes implementation a breeze.
What do you dislike about the product?
Hygraph still has some work to do in terms of editor usability for non-technical users and enterprise readiness, when compared with some more mature competitors. But it is at a good maturing pace, so it will get there.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Hygaph is always the first option when managing structured content for digital products in a scalable, developer-friendly way is required, particularly if time-to-market, integration with external systems, and localization are needed.
Highly Intuitive and Powerful CMS for Everyone
What do you like best about the product?
Hygraph is an outstanding headless CMS solution, particularly for users without a technical background. Its interface is highly intuitive, making content creation and management straightforward. The platform excels in its seamless integration with GraphQL, providing a robust and flexible API for developers. The ability to easily connect with other services is a significant advantage, streamlining workflows and increasing productivity. Hygraph balances powerful features with user-friendliness, making it a superior choice for both technical and non-technical teams.
What do you dislike about the product?
Pricing: The cost increases significantly as a project scales, with the free tier being suitable only for small projects.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Hygraph solves challenges for large teams by offering robust content staging. This allows for controlled publishing workflows from draft to production. Granular permissions ensure each team member has appropriate access, while version control and collaboration features streamline the content creation process.
Speed for a professional, clean result
What do you like best about the product?
In just a few minutes, I managed to create the required trade fair design for Gamescom. The result was clean and consistent with the identity of the trade fair. Our information clearly visible and tidy. The behind the scenes? An easy and comprehensible interface right from the start - child's play! Kudos to the creators ;)
What do you dislike about the product?
I don't think I have anything negative, on the contrary, positive experience with a easy integration!
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Promotional page of the trade fair stand and exhibited products produced quickly and professionally
Recently started using Hygraph
What do you like best about the product?
I like how versatile Hygraph is, it caters our products needs
What do you dislike about the product?
Like any new tech, it takes a bit to get used to
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Let's us edit content that was previously hardcoded.
A powerful and flexible headless CMS with great developer experience
What do you like best about the product?
Hygraph offers an intuitive and developer-friendly interface that makes building and managing structured content extremely efficient. I particularly appreciate its GraphQL API, which allows precise data fetching and excellent performance on the front end. Schema modeling is flexible, and the role-based permissions and localization features make it a robust choice for both small projects and enterprise-level content operations.
What do you dislike about the product?
While Hygraph excels in many areas, initial setup can be slightly overwhelming for non-technical users due to its headless nature. Additionally, complex content models with nested relations sometimes become hard to visualize or manage at scale without sufficient documentation. More in-depth analytics or reporting capabilities built into the platform would also be a welcome enhancement.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Hygraph is helping us manage complex, structured content across multiple digital platforms without relying on monolithic CMS solutions. It solves the problem of content fragmentation by allowing us to centralize content modeling, authoring, and delivery via GraphQL APIs. This streamlines collaboration between developers and content teams, reduces time-to-market for new content-driven features, and ensures consistency across channels. Its headless approach also gives us the flexibility to adapt quickly to new frontend frameworks and distribution needs, which is a significant operational advantage.
I was forced to use it otherwise I wouldn't have used it
What do you like best about the product?
I wasn't familiar with this platform; I was forced to use it for Gamescom. Once I got started, I felt a bit lost, but once I understood how to use it, it was simple and intuitive to get going. I think it's an effective tool that allows you to organize your work both internally and with external collaborators. I've explored a few of hygraph's features, but I plan to continue learning more.
What do you dislike about the product?
At first, I was a bit lost, not understanding what I was supposed to do. I didn't have permission to do things, and I didn't understand why. There was no guided introduction or anyone to explain how to do things. Even now, I'm still not entirely clear on what I can and can't do, or how to best use the tool.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I'm currently using it for Gamescom, and it definitely solved the problem of having older, more complicated platforms that required a lot more effort to enter all the data. It was quite simple and straightforward. I got immediate feedback on the data entered and the success of the entry.
Extensive customizability options
What do you like best about the product?
It’s quite flexible, and the layout is simple to understand, even for people who aren’t super tech-savvy. Their support has been quick and helpful whenever we needed a hand. Overall, it’s been a smooth experience.
What do you dislike about the product?
One thing that could be better is how the interface performs when handling larger projects. We noticed it sometimes felt a bit slow or cluttered when switching between sections or editing entries. It’s not a dealbreaker, but a smoother experience would make it even easier to work with every day.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Quick content customization
“The Headless CMS That Actually Gets It Right — My Hygraph Journey
What do you like best about the product?
The UI is clean and easy to navigate, so even non-technical team members can jump in and manage content without needing a developer every time.
From a developer’s perspective, the GraphQL API is a dream — fast, customizable, and well-documented. I also really appreciate the way Hygraph handles content modeling. It’s super flexible and lets you create structured content in a way that actually reflects how your site or app is built.
And honestly, the localization and asset management features are smoother than what I’ve seen in a lot of other CMS platforms. It just feels like Hygraph was built by people who understand the real-world challenges of building and scaling digital content.
From a developer’s perspective, the GraphQL API is a dream — fast, customizable, and well-documented. I also really appreciate the way Hygraph handles content modeling. It’s super flexible and lets you create structured content in a way that actually reflects how your site or app is built.
And honestly, the localization and asset management features are smoother than what I’ve seen in a lot of other CMS platforms. It just feels like Hygraph was built by people who understand the real-world challenges of building and scaling digital content.
What do you dislike about the product?
The biggest one for me is the learning curve when it comes to more advanced features like remote fields or custom resolvers — they’re powerful, but not always easy to grasp right away. Some of the documentation could go a bit deeper for real-world use cases.
Also, the pricing model might be a bit limiting for smaller teams or early-stage projects. It’s fair for what you get, but if you’re running on a tight budget, you’ll definitely want to keep an eye on API limits and user roles.
Finally, while the UI is clean and fast, it can sometimes feel a little too minimal — for example, bulk editing or more advanced filtering for content entries could be more robust.
Also, the pricing model might be a bit limiting for smaller teams or early-stage projects. It’s fair for what you get, but if you’re running on a tight budget, you’ll definitely want to keep an eye on API limits and user roles.
Finally, while the UI is clean and fast, it can sometimes feel a little too minimal — for example, bulk editing or more advanced filtering for content entries could be more robust.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
In the past, I’ve worked with traditional CMSs that tied content too closely to the presentation layer. That made it hard to reuse content across a website, mobile app, or third-party platforms. With Hygraph’s headless approach and GraphQL API, I can create content once and use it anywhere — which saves a ton of time and keeps everything consistent.
Another big win for me is how Hygraph handles content modeling. It gives me full control to define relationships, content types, and localization without feeling boxed in by rigid templates. That flexibility means we can build more scalable systems and adapt as things evolve, without needing to rebuild from scratch.
Another big win for me is how Hygraph handles content modeling. It gives me full control to define relationships, content types, and localization without feeling boxed in by rigid templates. That flexibility means we can build more scalable systems and adapt as things evolve, without needing to rebuild from scratch.
Easy to use and efficient
What do you like best about the product?
I really like the ease of finding the sections to edit and publish quickly, because sometimes I'm short on time and need to upload something quickly.
What do you dislike about the product?
I simply don't like that it doesn't have a wide catalog of themes to incorporate, like WordPress or another type of CMS. Having themes available on Themeforest, for example, would be ideal.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
What helps me the most is having a quick look at the CMS settings because I often do a lot of testing for clients who need specific actions from the manager.
Simple yet Compact
What do you like best about the product?
The simple user interface and it depended how you design it.Ease of Implementation
What do you dislike about the product?
The limited bandwidth inters of scheduling
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
The code less interface
I cam make live in the mater of minutes
I cam make live in the mater of minutes
showing 31 - 40