The solution's interface is very slow at times. The interface of the product needs improvement.
I wouldn't like to see any improvements in the future since it is an already good product in the present.
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
The solution's interface is very slow at times. The interface of the product needs improvement.
I wouldn't like to see any improvements in the future since it is an already good product in the present.
I have been using IBM Watson Studio for two years. I am an end user of the product.
It is a very stable and reliable solution.
It is a scalable solution.
The solution's technical support depends on the support plan one opts for, and our company currently has a basic support plan. I think that my company gets an answer within a day of contacting the product's support team, so it is not bad. If you want real-time support, then it does cost money. I rate the technical support an eight out of ten.
Positive
IBM Watson Studio is a reasonably priced product.
I am satisfied with the overall product.
I rate the overall product an eight out of ten.
I use IBM Watson Studio to analyze personal resumes. In general, we use the machine to analyze resumes.
With the solution, it is easy to create a machine-learning model. The solution's UI is helpful since we had to work on Microsoft Excel or a CSV file earlier.
From an improvement perspective, I would say that if the deployment environment and IBM Watson Studio's environment are separated, then it would be good. I would like them to be one and offer users a non-separated deployment phase.
From an improvement perspective, I want IBM's technical support team to provide more specific answers to queries.
I have been using IBM Watson Studio for three years. I don't remember the version of the solution.
Stability-wise, it is a great tool.
Around ten people in my company use the solution.
It is a scalable solution.
IBM Watson Studio is an extensively or regularly used solution in my company.
I have contacted the technical support team of IBM.
The initial setup of IBM Watson Studio is complex.
Once a person gets used to the deployment process of IBM Watson Studio, it doesn't take much time for them to deploy it in the future. When getting involved in the deployment process for the first time, there might be many things that one needs to know.
The solution can be deployed in three to six months.
Only one person can take care of the solution's deployment and maintenance processes.
I can do the deployment process without help from those not part of my company.
IBM Watson Studio is an expensive solution.
I recommend the solution to those who plan to use it.
I rate the overall tool a nine to ten out of ten.
It was used for some basic purposes because all I did was use Jupyter notebooks to run codes on the Snowflake environment. This was done by me at my previous job. I had just started using Jupyter notebooks to run Python codes on Snowflake data warehouses.
I was really more on the engineering side of things. The data scientists built certain models around it. So that, I guess, was a very big improvement.
For me, the valuable feature of the solution is the one that I used, which was Jupyter notebooks. Also, I think the data scientists used it to train their models. I am not the biggest user of it.
I think maybe the support is an area where it lacks. From my talks with the administrator, I think the support could be improved. My usage of it was limited to Jupyter notebooks.
I have experience with IBM Watson Studio for about a couple of months, like three months. Also, I don't remember the version of the solution I was using.
Stability-wise, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.
Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a six out of ten. However, I am not the best person to judge the solution based on scalability.
The solution is deployed on the cloud.
I would think that my organization had seen a return on investment. However, I am not the best person to speak on its ROI.
To those evaluating the product, I would say it's a good product to use from what I know, and it's not bad. Right now, we're just really making comparisons. I rate the overall solution a seven out of ten.