Sign in
Categories
Your Saved List Become a Channel Partner Sell in AWS Marketplace Amazon Web Services Home Help

Reviews from AWS customer

1 AWS reviews
  • 5 star
    0
  • 4 star
    0
  • 1
  • 2 star
    0
  • 1 star
    0

External reviews

82 reviews
from and

External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.


    YvesGoossens

A reasonably priced product that is reliable and scalable at the same time

  • August 18, 2023
  • Review provided by PeerSpot

What needs improvement?

The solution's interface is very slow at times. The interface of the product needs improvement.

I wouldn't like to see any improvements in the future since it is an already good product in the present.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using IBM Watson Studio for two years. I am an end user of the product.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It is a very stable and reliable solution.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It is a scalable solution.

How are customer service and support?

The solution's technical support depends on the support plan one opts for, and our company currently has a basic support plan. I think that my company gets an answer within a day of contacting the product's support team, so it is not bad. If you want real-time support, then it does cost money. I rate the technical support an eight out of ten.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

IBM Watson Studio is a reasonably priced product.

What other advice do I have?

I am satisfied with the overall product.

I rate the overall product an eight out of ten.


    Jue Jung

A stable and scalable tool that helps to conduct analysis process

  • July 21, 2023
  • Review provided by PeerSpot

What is our primary use case?

I use IBM Watson Studio to analyze personal resumes. In general, we use the machine to analyze resumes.

What is most valuable?

With the solution, it is easy to create a machine-learning model. The solution's UI is helpful since we had to work on Microsoft Excel or a CSV file earlier.

What needs improvement?

From an improvement perspective, I would say that if the deployment environment and IBM Watson Studio's environment are separated, then it would be good. I would like them to be one and offer users a non-separated deployment phase.

From an improvement perspective, I want IBM's technical support team to provide more specific answers to queries.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using IBM Watson Studio for three years. I don't remember the version of the solution.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Stability-wise, it is a great tool.

Around ten people in my company use the solution.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It is a scalable solution.

IBM Watson Studio is an extensively or regularly used solution in my company.

How are customer service and support?

I have contacted the technical support team of IBM.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup of IBM Watson Studio is complex.

Once a person gets used to the deployment process of IBM Watson Studio, it doesn't take much time for them to deploy it in the future. When getting involved in the deployment process for the first time, there might be many things that one needs to know.

The solution can be deployed in three to six months.

Only one person can take care of the solution's deployment and maintenance processes.

What about the implementation team?

I can do the deployment process without help from those not part of my company.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

IBM Watson Studio is an expensive solution.

What other advice do I have?

I recommend the solution to those who plan to use it.

I rate the overall tool a nine to ten out of ten.



    Phillipe Ramos

Though the tool provides exclusive features to run Python codes in a certain environment, it needs to improve support

  • June 22, 2023
  • Review provided by PeerSpot

What is our primary use case?

It was used for some basic purposes because all I did was use Jupyter notebooks to run codes on the Snowflake environment. This was done by me at my previous job. I had just started using Jupyter notebooks to run Python codes on Snowflake data warehouses.

How has it helped my organization?

I was really more on the engineering side of things. The data scientists built certain models around it. So that, I guess, was a very big improvement.

What is most valuable?

For me, the valuable feature of the solution is the one that I used, which was Jupyter notebooks. Also, I think the data scientists used it to train their models. I am not the biggest user of it.

What needs improvement?

I think maybe the support is an area where it lacks. From my talks with the administrator, I think the support could be improved. My usage of it was limited to Jupyter notebooks.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have experience with IBM Watson Studio for about a couple of months, like three months. Also, I don't remember the version of the solution I was using.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a six out of ten. However, I am not the best person to judge the solution based on scalability.

How was the initial setup?

The solution is deployed on the cloud.


What was our ROI?

I would think that my organization had seen a return on investment. However, I am not the best person to speak on its ROI.

What other advice do I have?

To those evaluating the product, I would say it's a good product to use from what I know, and it's not bad. Right now, we're just really making comparisons. I rate the overall solution a seven out of ten.