Threater (64-bit x86)
ThreaterReviews from AWS customer
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
28 reviews
from
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Easy-to-Use Interface, Though Some Features Feel Redundant on Firewalls
What do you like best about the product?
Interface is easy to navigate between sites
What do you dislike about the product?
redundant features available on firewalls
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We use content filtering throughout all of our locations.
Easy On-Site Setup and Installation That Just Works
What do you like best about the product?
They were easy to have set up and installed on site. Works like they should.
What do you dislike about the product?
pulling reports and unexpected block reports are a little slow, but manageable.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It blocks a lot of the unwanted traffic in and out, freeing up bandwidth for real work to get done.
ThreatBlockr IP based block list management is quick, easy and reliable protection
What do you like best about the product?
Ease of management and powerful block lists are available, customer support is one of the best I've ever dealt with.
What do you dislike about the product?
Does not support Entra SSO yet, no DNS whitelist feature.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We use ThreatBlockr primarily for zero-day IP blocking and geo-blocking. Utilizing the subscriptions lists we have near instant protection without requiring a lot of overhead from our team.
Threatblockr is a great solution
What do you like best about the product?
the number of sources integrated in the solution
What do you dislike about the product?
The resolution of support ticket. They don't provide all the details from the beginning
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
the number of sources included in the solution. Improve our detection.
Hands-Off Network Security, Minimal Manual Interventions
What do you like best about the product?
I like that Threater is more of a hands-off security application once it is set up. It's very easy to administer, which I find particularly beneficial. The initial setup was very easy, making the transition smooth.
What do you dislike about the product?
A lot of legitimate sites get added to the auto threat lists, which causes us to manually have to go in and whitelist the IP addresses.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use Threater to protect our network by automatically blocking malicious sites and IP addresses. It's hands-off and easy to administer once set up.
Great product
What do you like best about the product?
ThreatBlockr is a great product capable of numerous use cases and handling millions of packets.
What do you dislike about the product?
I can't think of anything negative it does its job well.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Blocking unwanted traffic on the perimeter from countries and ASN's
Works well, intuitive interface and support is great
What do you like best about the product?
The easy configuration and setup. Support is responsive and knowledgeable. Does not slow down internet connection and protects both inbound and outbound traffic separately.
What do you dislike about the product?
The logging tab is helpful but requires a page refresh when editing the query or wanting to update the list.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We no longer have to wonder who is trying to access or even succeeding at accessing our network. An extra layer of security that alleviates and supports our firewall.
ThreatBlockr is the best bump-in-the-wire IP/URL reputation security appliance I've ever used!
What do you like best about the product?
The ability to ingest, aggregate, and take action based on different threat reputation and open-source feeds using STIX/TAXII and web .txt URLs.
This is something only a combination of SIEM/SOAR/UTM/TIP solutions could do.
Often this combination focuses on enrichment and IOC hunting, but it was difficult to ever take this information and compile it into a meaningful reputation block list that an NGFW could then ingest and take action with.
This is something only a combination of SIEM/SOAR/UTM/TIP solutions could do.
Often this combination focuses on enrichment and IOC hunting, but it was difficult to ever take this information and compile it into a meaningful reputation block list that an NGFW could then ingest and take action with.
What do you dislike about the product?
Centralized logging of the different appliances' web activities such as their blocking behavior requires a SIEM or centralized Syslog server.
It doesn't allow for centralized searching of these logs via the SaaS portal.
It doesn't allow for centralized searching of these logs via the SaaS portal.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Solved holes in NGFW reputation-based blocks and is easier to administrate and troubleshoot activity than most NGFWs.
Allowed us to pull in different paid and open-source STIX/TAXII and URL-based reputation sources and create our own block lists which is much more complex and difficult to achieve when combining SIEM/SOAR/UTM/TIP/NGFW technology stacks.
Geo-Blocking is probably the best on the market and we prefer it heavily over similar NGFW functionality.
If you have worked with some of the leading Cloud WAF Geo-Blocking rulesets and policies; ThreatBlockr is their on-prem equivalent in ease of implementation, effectiveness, and administration.
Allowed us to pull in different paid and open-source STIX/TAXII and URL-based reputation sources and create our own block lists which is much more complex and difficult to achieve when combining SIEM/SOAR/UTM/TIP/NGFW technology stacks.
Geo-Blocking is probably the best on the market and we prefer it heavily over similar NGFW functionality.
If you have worked with some of the leading Cloud WAF Geo-Blocking rulesets and policies; ThreatBlockr is their on-prem equivalent in ease of implementation, effectiveness, and administration.
The protection works well and the support team is great.
What do you like best about the product?
I appreciate the additional email alerts to make sure our Bandura device is fully patched, and the other emails showing the protection stats.
What do you dislike about the product?
I don't have a specific item to dislike.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It provides the additional layer of protection we desired in our infrastructure, along with consistently updating its known threats. We do utilize the country blocks too.
Extremely Simple & Effective Network Protection
What do you like best about the product?
The appliances are effortless to deploy, configure, and maintain. We can quickly look up log data on each device individually when we suspect something may be getting blocked. Their reports clearly illustrate the importance of the service to leadership. Using ThreatBlockr appliances between our UTMs and our WAN connections have allowed us to offload much of the load that our UTMs would have needed to process if they were connected directly to the Internet.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes, the threat lists block shared webserver IPs, resulting in false positive blocking of legitimate websites. Because of where we position the appliances in our topology, I can't easily see what specific hosts on our internal network are trying to access so we often have to compare ThreatBlockr logs to UTM logs to get the full picture.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Adding a very effective 1st layer of defense to our network helps ensure that malicious traffic (both inbound and potentially outbound) is blocked efficiently based on crowdsourced lists.
showing 1 - 10