Chef is like a master chef in a kitchen for computer systems. It's used to create recipes (cookbooks) that specify how servers and apps should be set up. Chef then makes sure these instructions are followed the same way on all computers in a network. The ChefServer is like the recipe book, where all these instructions are kept and shared, making it easier to manage and control how software and systems work in a company.
External reviews
88 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
An effective solution that simplifies deployment and seamlessly integrates systems
What do you like best about the product?
Progress Chef has proven to be an exceptional solution from the moment we implemented it. We seamlessly integrated the software with our existing systems, experiencing no issues or compatibility concerns. The customer support team has been consistently available and provides valuable assistance whenever needed, demonstrating their reliability and significant contribution to our work.
What do you dislike about the product?
The current user interface of Progress Chef needs improvement. Although it functions adequately, its usability lags behind other similar programs. This presents a challenge, especially for individuals who are not as familiar with technology, as it may impede their ability to effectively utilize the software.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Progress Chef streamlines settings management across different domains, providing a convenient and efficient solution. Its centralized platform automates actions, ensuring consistency and minimizing errors, leading to improved operational efficiency.
Efficiency and Our Path to Streamlined Project
What do you like best about the product?
Progress Chef has significantly streamlined our daily tasks through its automation capabilities. This software provides the flexibility required for customized setups, which is crucial for managing our various projects. Additionally, the resource management features have been excellent, allowing us to allocate our resources effectively. We also greatly appreciate the prompt and helpful customer support team, who are always available to assist us whenever we encounter obstacles.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes, the interface can be challenging to navigate, especially when working on complex projects. Improving the interface for greater efficiency would significantly enhance the user experience.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Progress Chef's automation capabilities have greatly diminished the time we spend on repetitive tasks. Its flexibility enables us to easily adjust to different project demands, and its resource management tools guarantee optimal utilization of resources, ultimately enhancing project efficiency as a whole.
Easy configuration management, optimization abilities, and complete infrastructure and application automation
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature is its easy configuration management, optimization abilities, complete infrastructure and application automation, and its superiority over other similar tools. It smoothly integrates with CI processes and helps reduce manual errors in system management and configuration. It is an effective and user-friendly tool for automating IT infrastructure and applications.
What needs improvement?
In terms of improvement, Chef could get better by being more widely available, adapting to different needs, and providing better documentation. There is also an issue with shared resources like cookbooks lacking context, which could lead to problems when multiple companies use them. Chef should aim for wider availability, better flexibility, clearer documentation, and improved management of shared resources to prevent conflicts. Many companies are now moving to Ansible, so I would recommend better documentation, easier customer use, and simpler integration. I have concerns about the complexity of migrating to different servers and would prefer a simpler process.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Chef for almost a year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I would rate the stability of the solution an eight out of ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Approximately 16 people use Chef at our company.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Ansible has more advanced features than Chef. Ansible is easy to install, highly scalable, excels in orchestration and streamlined provisioning, and is easy to deploy. However, I cannot decide whether I prefer Ansible or Chef.
What other advice do I have?
Overall, I would rate Chef a seven out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Configuration management tool(IAAC)
What do you like best about the product?
Best configuration management tool for applying on multiple servers at once.
What do you dislike about the product?
Troubleshooting cookbook errors. Logs are difficult to read. Installing agent process is a tedious work.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Ease of server provisioning and initial state setup.
Great documentation and training
What do you like best about the product?
Learn Chef and online documentation are both top-notch.
Learn Chef has been invaluable for our team and is probably one of the best free vendor-hosted training tools we've encountered with any of our vendors.
Learn Chef has been invaluable for our team and is probably one of the best free vendor-hosted training tools we've encountered with any of our vendors.
What do you dislike about the product?
Our most significant issue is keeping up as the product evolves. We are still using Berkshelf and are struggling to find the time to learn about policy files to facilitate the transition away from Berkshelf.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
First and foremost, we use Chef for the configuration management of our Windows Servers. In the past, we used a lot of PowerShell scripts and Group Policy to manage configuration. As our environment grew and we went from one or two Active Directory domains to five or six, Group Policy became more problematic. Chef has allowed us to utilize the same configuration source regardless of the domain the system resides in and even for those not in an AD Domain.
Now that we are managing most of our Windows Server configuration with Chef, we are now moving into using Chef for compliance purposes.
Now that we are managing most of our Windows Server configuration with Chef, we are now moving into using Chef for compliance purposes.
Very pleased with Chef and it's products
What do you like best about the product?
The product line up offered from Chef. I mostly use the Infrastructure management and compliance tools. Super helpful and innovative.
What do you dislike about the product?
In the past, when I've run into hurdles working with Chef software, I've reached out to Chef directly and to the community and don't always find what I need.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Chef is solving infrastructure management and cloud compliance beautifully. It's so much better to just write a cookbook or inspec profile and have Chef do the work than to spend hours doing all the work yourself.
Progress Chef review.
What do you like best about the product?
I like their support and Chef meetings plus Chef is easy to manage and implement when the company has great support, it does adds to the value of the product.
What do you dislike about the product?
Nothing, it's a great product, and it is very well supportred.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
If there is a problem, we report it at the meetings and it usually gets quickly resolved.
Very Efficient and reliable
What do you like best about the product?
Progress Chef in my opinion is one of the best tools to maintain and manage servers. It has made our job much easier.
What do you dislike about the product?
There are very few downside and even few which I have faced, the setup and downtimes are daunting but apart from it it's great.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Earlier we used to mange our servers and cloud infra, manually but with is product, its way easier for us to understand the problems that occur in our systems.
A collaboration tool for team development
What do you like best about the product?
The capacity of Progress Chef to enhance team collaboration in application creation and deployment is what I find most remarkable. Team members can easily share resources and information thanks to its collaboration features and unified platform. I also value the tool's support for various computer languages and cloud platforms, which gives development and distribution more freedom and speed.
What do you dislike about the product?
Even though it's a powerful tool, Progress Chef might not be the best choice for smaller teams or businesses due to its intricacy and higher expense. The program requires some technological proficiency and has a steep learning curve. Not to mention, customer support could be more quick and useful, especially to those who are new to the site.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Ineffective processes, human error, and scalability problems are just a few of the problems that Progress Chef addresses for businesses during the creation and implementation of applications. By automating time-consuming chores, its robust automation features and workflow management tools free up workers to concentrate on more crucial aspects of development. Deployment is also more scalable and error-free thanks to its support for numerous settings.
Powerful Open Source Configuration Management on another level!
What do you like best about the product?
In my experience, Progress Chef has several strengths that make it a compelling choice for organizations looking to streamline their infrastructure management.
Firstly, Chef's declarative language makes it easy to define and manage the desired state of infrastructure components. By defining "recipes" and "cookbooks" that describe the desired configuration of each resource, Chef ensures that the infrastructure remains consistent and predictable across environments.
Another strength of Chef is its flexibility and extensibility. Chef has a large community of users and contributors who have created a wide range of plugins, integrations, and cookbooks that can be used to automate everyday tasks and integrate with other tools. This makes Progress Chef easy to customize Chef to suit an organisation's specific needs, whether a small startup or a large enterprise.
Firstly, Chef's declarative language makes it easy to define and manage the desired state of infrastructure components. By defining "recipes" and "cookbooks" that describe the desired configuration of each resource, Chef ensures that the infrastructure remains consistent and predictable across environments.
Another strength of Chef is its flexibility and extensibility. Chef has a large community of users and contributors who have created a wide range of plugins, integrations, and cookbooks that can be used to automate everyday tasks and integrate with other tools. This makes Progress Chef easy to customize Chef to suit an organisation's specific needs, whether a small startup or a large enterprise.
What do you dislike about the product?
However, like any tool, Progress Chef also has some potential drawbacks. For example, it can have a steep learning curve, especially for those new to infrastructure automation or programming. Additionally, Chef's complexity and flexibility can sometimes make troubleshooting problems or maintaining large codebases difficult.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Progress Chef helps me to solve the following problems in my IT environment:
Ensuring consistency: With Chef, IT professionals can define the desired configuration of each component in their infrastructure as code. This ensures that the infrastructure remains consistent and predictable across environments, reducing the risk of human error and simplifying troubleshooting.
Automating tasks: Chef allows IT professionals to automate many of the tasks involved in managing infrastructure, such as provisioning new servers, deploying applications, and configuring network settings. This can save significant time and effort, freeing IT professionals to focus on higher-level tasks.
Scaling infrastructure: Chef makes it easier to scale infrastructure resources up or down in response to changing demand. This can help organizations save costs by only using the resources they need, and it can also improve reliability and performance by allowing resources to be added or removed as needed.
Improving security: Chef can help IT professionals improve the security of their infrastructure by automating the configuration of security settings and policies, such as firewalls and access controls. This can help reduce the risk of security breaches and ensure that the infrastructure remains compliant with relevant regulations and standards.
Ensuring consistency: With Chef, IT professionals can define the desired configuration of each component in their infrastructure as code. This ensures that the infrastructure remains consistent and predictable across environments, reducing the risk of human error and simplifying troubleshooting.
Automating tasks: Chef allows IT professionals to automate many of the tasks involved in managing infrastructure, such as provisioning new servers, deploying applications, and configuring network settings. This can save significant time and effort, freeing IT professionals to focus on higher-level tasks.
Scaling infrastructure: Chef makes it easier to scale infrastructure resources up or down in response to changing demand. This can help organizations save costs by only using the resources they need, and it can also improve reliability and performance by allowing resources to be added or removed as needed.
Improving security: Chef can help IT professionals improve the security of their infrastructure by automating the configuration of security settings and policies, such as firewalls and access controls. This can help reduce the risk of security breaches and ensure that the infrastructure remains compliant with relevant regulations and standards.
showing 31 - 40