We mainly use TalkDesk for inbound calls, dialers, SMS, and other digital solutions. We also use it for quality management and recording solutions.
Talkdesk
TalkdeskExternal reviews
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Great platform for call management
Talkdesk, the Brilliant Application for Customer Service but Price is a Hiccup
The app creates a stable environment where customers air their views and insights, with multiple communication channels
We manage events and webinars through the assistance of this software
Talkdesk has a brilliant value consultant space which has an accurate knowledge base
It has high financial requirements, to make the software accessible and manageable
We give professional consultations to our customers using Talkdesk, with updated and consistent knowledge base
We conduct detailed marketing surveys where insights concerning our business are accurately accessed
We use Talkdesk to listen to concerns that clients air, for a robust business model
Great call clarity and helpful AI tool
Product enhancements improve user experience and streamline operations
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
TalkDesk has good integration capability apart from the default products and excellent customization capabilities. You can integrate with products available in the TalkDesk app store, including ServiceNow, Salesforce, and multiple other products. Additionally, if APIs are available, you can custom integrate with third-party applications that are not in the list, which is a significant advantage.
It helps tremendously because with our CRM we can access all call details, interaction details, and recordings. All information is available for each case. We don't need to open TalkDesk separately to check recordings, date-time, or other metadata. Instead, we can directly get all details from the CRM itself. There are additional features where information can pop up through a browser, so agents don't need to search based on who is calling. They can directly view the customer profile without going back and forth.
What needs improvement?
For startups, TalkDesk is a good solution because it offers basic functionality without too many customizable options, such as the dialer. It has a basic dialer and agentless dialer, but customization options are limited. There aren't many options for different schedules, list management, and complex features compared to other products. However, it works well for startups and companies seeking a reliable industry solution with minimal downtime.
The dialer functionality could be improved as it only offers basic features for agentless and predictive or automated dialing.
TalkDesk technical support is good, but they could improve their on-call support. Currently, support is mainly handled through ticket submission with email responses. While calling options exist, they prefer to communicate via email rather than providing direct call support as some other products do.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using TalkDesk for around three years.
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
Implementation is much better with cloud products compared to on-premises solutions. Instance enablement takes less than a day to configure and start using. The only potential challenge might be obtaining phone numbers depending on the regions. Bringing up an instance is much faster compared to on-premises solutions, which is consistent with most cloud solutions.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Every product has its own advantages and disadvantages. Genesis is a top player but has limited default reports and dashboards with minimal customization options. Nice has good recording solutions. TalkDesk stands out with its user-friendly UI compared to other industry-leading products. It is well-organized, except for the studio flows which can feel somewhat disorganized. They introduced modules in studio flow a few years ago, but the interface for studio creation could still be more user-friendly.
What was our ROI?
There is definitely some ROI, but as a telephone engineer, we do not calculate business improvements or related metrics.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Organizations should consider TalkDesk based on their specific needs, whether they are startups or large organizations. For manual dialing, inbound calls, and basic AI integration capabilities, TalkDesk is suitable. However, for advanced AI capabilities and chatbots, other solutions such as yellow.ai might be more appropriate. TalkDesk is particularly good for basic inbound and outbound capabilities.
What other advice do I have?
We tested AI features in TalkDesk such as Copilot and auto-translate, though we didn't extensively use them. These are valuable features as TalkDesk and other products are incorporating AI capabilities. The system can auto-translate calls and highlight repeated words based on customer scenarios, making it easier to identify contact reasons in specific industries such as hospitality.
TalkDesk is efficient and user-friendly for both small and large businesses. It excels in AI capabilities, inbound calls, standard outbound calls, quality management, and interaction analysis. The system allows for storing and checking real-time data, and with capable developers, customization of live monitoring and historical data analysis is possible through backend integration.
The voice functionality in TalkDesk is particularly strong and easy to train. The Studio flow allows for automation and UI customization for both agents and admins. Integration is straightforward, and agents can efficiently manage cases with automated data population and AI-powered interaction summaries.
On a rating scale, TalkDesk deserves an 8 out of 10 as it offers comprehensive functionality and continues to improve.
The solution is currently hosted on AWS and Azure, depending on the region, with most servers hosted on AWS. Customers do not have direct access to their servers but interact through the interface.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Using Talkdesk is awesome!
It brings everything into a unified, cloud-based contact center platform, allowing teams to handle voice, chat, email, and more from one place. With AI-powered tools and real-time analytics, Talkdesk helps us:
Respond to customers faster
Personalize interactions more effectively
Improve agent productivity through automation and smart routing
Gain insights into performance through dashboards and reporting
Comfortable customer support
Quick and powerful solution to implement for the integration of AI tools
Its a great program with a few bugs sometimes
Improving customer relationships with enhanced reporting and effective call scheduling
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
What needs improvement?
For how long have I used the solution?
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
How are customer service and support?
How would you rate customer service and support?
Neutral
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
How was the initial setup?
What about the implementation team?
What was our ROI?
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
What other advice do I have?
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
An admin-friendly jack-of-all-trades CCaaS
Our agents and supervisors love having access to live dashboards. They can customize what information is relevant to them and it helps them be more independent with their schedules.
Support and our CSM/TAM understand our feature requests, tie them to use cases with their other customers, and advocate for those features internally. We've seen several of our ideas released during our partnership.
Talkdesk is a jack-of-all-trades, master of none. Many AI-related features seem like they were groundbreaking when first launched, but they may be starting to fall behind specialized vendors in terms of feature quality or stability.