I mostly use Appian for internal applications in the firm.
Appian Platform
AppianExternal reviews
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Enables seamless transition from process-centric to data-centric operations with robust data management
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
The most beneficial aspect of Appian is its data management capabilities and the process engine in general. It allows for a seamless transition from process-centric to data-centric operations. Additionally, the zero-code integration feature is remarkable, allowing for ease of data transfer and workflow enhancement.
What needs improvement?
I would like to see more enhancement in the user interface to allow more freedom in designing the sites and pages. The user interface should be updated for a more modern and appealing look.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working with Appian for around fifteen years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
So far, I find Appian reliable and stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Appian is scalable, but it depends on how you build your applications. With a proper setup, Appian is scalable.
How are customer service and support?
The technical support is generally good. Though I have had some issues in the past, overall, I consider it effective.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Neutral
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have experience with Microsoft Power Apps and have seen OutSystems. However, most of my experience has been with Appian.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup of Appian was very easy.
What about the implementation team?
No implementation strategy was used. We simply built different platforms like development, testing, UAT, and production.
What was our ROI?
Appian is very efficient, allowing us to build a lot of applications within a financial year, making it cost-effective.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing of Appian is based on the number of users and generally ranges from 70 to 100 USD per user per month. I would like it to be more flexible, not solely based on the number of users.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
As alternatives, I have worked with Microsoft Power Apps and have explored OutSystems.
What other advice do I have?
I would recommend looking into data management, reporting, and process capabilities of Appian. Overall, I rate Appian as a nine.
Manages databases effectively with seamless foreign key creation and data manipulation
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
What needs improvement?
For how long have I used the solution?
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
How are customer service and support?
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
How was the initial setup?
What other advice do I have?
Seamless integration enhances workflows while memory optimization can improve complex processes
What is our primary use case?
I am working with all of these products: Pega, Appian, and OutSystems. I use Appian as a process orchestrator for workflow and rule-based routing, and it is preferred when I am developing an enterprise-wide application. The application is mobile-friendly, allowing me to use it across any device, whether mobile, laptop, or desktop.
What is most valuable?
It is easy for me to define the process and create configurable workflows. Additionally, they have provided inbuilt integration points and services, which facilitates integration with external services.
What needs improvement?
If there is a very complex process that includes a lot of data transitioning and memory-centric processes, it consumes a lot of memory. For those use cases, Appian needs to optimize memory utilization. AI-related features should also be more integrated.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been in this ecosystem for quite some time. For Pega, it is 20 years, and for Appian, it is more than ten years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I would rate the stability as eight out of ten. As a product, there are no issues. It depends on how it has been designed and how it has been configured.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Appian is scalable in its architecture.
How are customer service and support?
Their customer service is responsive, and the team is very prompt for support. The response depends on the kind of partnership vendors have and their relationship with them. For step one issues, which impact most of the business on that workflow, I get quick support from the Appian team.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
What about the implementation team?
Whenever there is a production deployment, it involves the Appian development team. However, if other systems are also involved, representatives from the integration teams of different systems are needed as well.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
There are two buckets. On the pricier side, both Appian and Pega are enterprise-level solutions, placing them on the slightly higher side.
However, the robustness of the products, their features, and their availability justify the pricing.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I have considered Appian, Pega, Uncorp, and Mendix as alternate solutions.
What other advice do I have?
Overall, everything is eight out of ten.
I am a little bit biased towards Pega. Pega has a lot more standardized processes, which take less time to go to market compared to Appian. Appian provides a platform.