We use the solution for endpoint security. We use the tool to ensure the endpoints are protected from abnormal activities, people don't run different scripts, and people don't compromise endpoints and use them to get into the network.

The solution's most valuable feature is that it is robust and can detect almost every malicious activity that occurs within the endpoint.

I would like a centralized deployment where I could roll out or push it to all endpoints.

I have been using CrowdStrike Falcon Surface for two years.

CrowdStrike Falcon Surface is a very stable solution.

CrowdStrike Falcon Surface is a very scalable solution. A lot of customers are using CrowdStrike Falcon Surface. One of our customers for the solution has 12,000 endpoints.

The solution's technical support is handled centrally by CrowdStrike, and the support was also good and knowledgeable.

I didn't deploy the solution, but I supported customers that use it. I think it took them up to six months to deploy the CrowdStrike Falcon Surface.

The solution somehow doesn't allow intrusion and minimizes fraud or cyber-attacks. Within the time we're using it, CrowdStrike Falcon Surface detected a lot of intrusion from malicious individuals. It was able to prevent a lot of insider threats where people internally will want to run some malicious scripts within the environment.

It detects those malicious attacks quickly, and we can prevent them. It minimized a lot of cyber and fraud-related activities that could have cost the bank a lot of money.

CrowdStrike Falcon Surface is a cloud-based solution. In light of the recent global IT outage that affected CrowdStrike, they should do proper change management.

Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

It also helps you with access, like we have dark web monitoring and admin protection management. So, the use cases can vary from organization to organization, but every organization has different value in it.

It helps to prevent unauthorized access or identity theft from external sites. If your identity is stolen, you can ban it.

Real-time monitoring is important because it runs multiple things on a single platform, like IDA, EDR, XDR, and SIM solutions. It captures all technology with one agent, which makes it easier for us to fix customer issues. 

Having a single console is helpful, especially when customers have multiple vendors for their products. It's easier to manage one partner. In this case, CrowdStrike Falcon helps.

One thing that is not yet available is attack simulation. For example, if someone tries to attack your Active Directory on inactive accounts, a cyber attacker could hack those accounts and try to get into your company. This could be a feature to add. It would give a fake reply each time someone tries to hack it. Multiple companies that I know of would like that.

I have been using it for two years. 

It is a stable product.

I would rate the scalability a nine out of ten.  It's a scalable solution that is very easy to deploy.

It is suitable for every kind of business, including small, medium, or enterprise businesses.

Technical support depends on a system integrator.

CrowdStrike technical support regarding Identity Protection has a team, but if there's no issue with the agent, you can work it out yourself.

The support is good.

Positive

The initial setup is easy. We only have one option available right now: on the cloud. It gets applied to endpoints, but it's cloud-based.

It is very easy to integrate this product into our existing environment.

It's a premium product.

From my end, it works. But it can be recommended or viewed by a personal customer. We are not the sole user of CrowdStrike Falcon. It's the end user.

I would recommend using it. For me, it is the best product ever. Overall, I would rate it an eight out of ten.  

We use the solution for Windows and non-Windows infrastructure. We have Falcon clients on all our machines.

We integrate with CyberArk, which includes DNA reporting, particularly for identifying old and ticket-based attacks. We’ve implemented this integration to receive risk-based scoring. Our strategy focuses on preventing privilege escalation, as our last major incident, NotPetya, resulted from this vulnerability. To address this, we’ve implemented measures through CyberArk and CrowdStrike.

When we encounter phishing attacks via email, we sandbox any reported items. Whenever a suspicious email is reported, we conduct sandboxing in CrowdStrike and block emails, domains, and IPs based on the resulting threat intelligence.

The most critical aspect is preventing privilege escalation, particularly for domain admins with the highest credentials. With our integration of CyberArk, passwords are never transmitted to the endpoint. Instead, a secure RDP file is created, and Falcon is used to prevent privilege escalation attempts.

As customers, we always update our systems whenever a new release is available, with clients connecting directly to the Internet for these updates. We have an agent who manages these updates on the clients, but as an organization, we don’t have control over them. CrowdStrike should assess the impact on endpoints before releasing such updates.

Our organization now seeks AI-based stock monitoring to prioritize thousands of alerts generated across various platforms. The AI integration is still in its early stages, so we would like to see Falcon develop tools that can integrate with multiple platforms and help identify the highest-priority alerts.

I have been using CrowdStrike Falcon Threat Intelligence since 2017. We are using the latest version of the solution.

I rate the solution’s stability a nine out of ten.

The integration part is very good. CrowdStrike collaborates with most security vendors, so it's very easy to get one platform for our risk factors across the enterprise.

40 thousand devices are using this solution. We get many alerts from Falcon, sometimes from end users and sometimes from Internet-facing servers.

I rate the solution's scalability a nine out of ten.

We struggle to get specialized resources from CrowdStrike in a few cases.

Neutral

CrowdStrike Falcon Black is an on-premise solution that was very complicated, so we faced performance issues. The main reason for the switch is the performance issues reported by multiple application owners.

Initially, we faced many challenges because we had to open ports from each of our subnets to Falcon, as it’s a SaaS solution. Each client needs to communicate with Falcon servers for threat intelligence. Due to the complexity of our network, we had to carefully consider all security aspects when opening the external communication ports to Falcon.

It took 25 to 30 days to deploy it completely.

We began with our Tier 0 servers, which had the most critical and highest privileges. After securing those, we moved on to Tier 1 and Tier 2 as we continued deployment. Our approach was to first address the highest risk factors across the enterprise and then gradually move on to securing endpoints like user desktops and laptops.

I rate the initial setup as seven out of ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy.

We took professional services from CrowdStrike, so it was done in-house with only two people: one from the execution team and one from the cybersecurity team.

When we track the annual priority cases, especially the security incidents, we have made many improvements. That is ROI in terms of tracking security incidents.

I rate the product’s pricing a six out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.

Most customer requirements focus on email security, so we’ve implemented Mimecast. CrowdStrike Falcon integrates with Mimecast, allowing us to provide advanced security beyond Office 365’s capabilities. With DMARC in place, Falcon helps us identify domains that pose a risk to the organization.

I advise you to look for customer feedback, and then they should also look for Gartner and other industry leaders so you get the ranking.

Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

I used the tool since my company wanted a product with next-generation antivirus and EDR, as it can help with the detection of malicious activities and behavior detection, and the MI and machine learning part in the tool also helps.

Only for the customized IOCs, there is a need to highlight certain aspects, and based on it, we get to block only the hash values but is not based on the file name, like .exe, or other extensions, so I can't block them, making it in an area where the solution needs to improve.

My company had raised a concern with CrowdStrike's support team when one of the antivirus applications that communicates with CrowdStrike started misbehaving. For both the aforementioned tools, the same support ticket had to be raised. If my company had to provide any suggestions regarding the whitelisting part, there was a delay of over a month when dealing with the product's support team. If the tool's support team suggests users follow certain steps, and if it is not followed or is not in progress, then after two or three days, the tool's support team needs to join a video call and provide a resolution to the users.

Some policies in the tool need to be fine-tuned. Customized IOCs need to be improved since they have certain shortcomings. With the customized IOCs, it can be made possible to block a file extension with a filename or file extension type of blocking. Providing users with the ability to customize policies would be a good improvement to the solution.

I have been using CrowdStrike Falcon Threat Intelligence for a year. I am a user of the tool.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution an eight and a half out of ten.

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

My company's cybersecurity and IT security team use the tool. In my company, there are 15,000 users. For servers, there are 1,500 users.

Right now, there is no need to increase the usage of the tool.

The solution's technical support is not good. I rate the technical support a four to five out of ten.

Neutral

I have experience with Palo Alto.

The detection and other functionalities in CrowdStrike and Palo Alto are the same, but cost-wise, CrowdStrike is reasonable. Technically, I would prefer Palo Alto over CrowdStrike.

The product's deployment phase is easy. I rate the setup phase of the tool as a ten on a scale where one is difficult and ten means it is an easy process.

The solution can be deployed in the cloud and on an on-premises model.

The solution can be initially deployed in a minute.

Considering the number of users, servers, cloud, and on-premises environment, it hardly takes 15 to 20 days. When there are laptop and desktop users who are online, and there is a need to install the agent, then there can be some issues, and with such minor things, ten days are more than enough for the installation.

CrowdStrike is a reasonably priced tool.

In terms of the ability of the tool to deal with threats, I would say that the product does it by around 85 percent.

The real-time response of the tool is good, and I feel it is around 90 to 95 percent.

The tool's incident-handling capability is good.

Considering the influence of the product on our company over some time, I would say that the solution is cost-effective and offers good threat detection features. The tool's interface is also good.

The tool's AI features are good, but they are not useful for our company since the area of detection is not something in our bucket right now.

If you have a big budget, go with Palo Alto. If you have a low budget and want a tool that provides more accuracy during detection, then it is better to go with CrowdStrike.

I rate the tool a nine out of ten.

The tool helps to increase security because the threats we face keep changing, so we need better protection. In the past, we've faced some attacks on our network, and while we managed to deal with them, we realized we needed even stronger protection. That's why we decided to implement CrowdStrike Identity Protection.

The main feature we rely on is the product's intelligence. We appreciate the advice from the team during implementation. One of the main reasons we chose this product is its compatibility with Office 365.

Improvement is always possible. It's challenging to gauge how much future mitigation is provided, especially since we've only been using the product for about one and a half years. Every product faces this challenge because nothing is ever completely foolproof. So, besides relying on technology, we also focus on increasing our staff's awareness of security issues. Feedback from my colleagues suggests that the reporting and dashboarding of incidents could be improved.

I have been working with the product for one and a half years. 

I rate the tool's stability an eight out of ten. 

Scalability isn't a problem for us. Many big multinational companies use CrowdStrike Identity Protection, so it's designed to handle environments like ours without any issues. My company has 500 users. 

The tool's deployment is easy. Thanks to the installation scripting we utilized, the technical rollout took about two weeks. Then, there was some additional time, around two to four weeks, for customization and configuration. After that, the systems were up and running. So, all in all, it took about three months to have our mitigation strategies in place. We have one engineer for maintenance. 

I rate the overall product an eight out of ten. I would recommend it to others. However, it's crucial to understand areas where the product might not provide coverage and how to mitigate those gaps. For example, it covers endpoints, networks, and Office 365 environments, but are there other areas in the attack surface that it doesn't address well? It's essential to be aware of any potential gaps upfront.

The solution helps in preventing incidents. However, it's challenging to quantify the exact impact because we don't know what would have happened without it. It's similar to having insurance for your house. 

We use CrowdStrike Falcon for intrusion prevention management.

CrowdStrike Falcon proactively blocks threats and provides us with insights.

CrowdStrike Falcon integration is seamless.

The endpoint and server management are the most valuable features of CrowdStrike Falcon.

CrowdStrike Falcon's GUI requires improvement for user-friendliness. The console's available options are unclear, making it difficult to understand and extract details. Additionally, correlating information within the console and reports proves challenging.

I have been using CrowdStrike Falcon for two years.

CrowdStrike Falcon had some initial stability issues in our environment, likely due to its new integration. However, it appears to have matured and is now functioning reliably.

Being cloud-based, CrowdStrike Falcon offers easy scalability. Adding licenses through procurement increases resources without the need for additional hardware, making scaling straightforward.

While the technical support meets all response time commitments outlined in our Service Level Agreement, some users believe they should strive for a higher standard – a Security Level Target. This means responding to security incidents immediately, not just within SLA windows. Security tools are crucial for our environment's protection, and their use shouldn't be limited by SLA constraints.

Positive

After using Symantec, Trend Micro, McAfee, and VMware Carbon Black, we migrated to CrowdStrike Falcon due to a lack of support from the previous vendors and their shortcomings in comprehensive threat detection.

I would rate CrowdStrike Falcon eight out of ten.

The maintenance required is reasonable.

We have 6,000 endpoints in our environment.

CrowdStrike Falcon shines with its user-friendliness, providing clear insights into the endpoint environment. Proactive features are a major plus, offering actionable items and valuable attack path simulations that empower better decision-making.

We use Falcon to check the login attempts of the users. We can see who has logged in and when. We can see which workstation is assigned to each user. CrowdStrike helps us enforce policies, such as USB policies and users recycling passwords. 

CrowdStrike is deployed on every workstation, so policy changes can be enforced on all of them. It lowers the manual work on each of the workstations. It has helped us manage device usage in our environment. 

I like CrowdStrike's policies. The integration is easy to do. I can remember once when Falcon prevented a security breach occurred because someone clicked on a phishing link, and their credential was compromised. We used threat tracking to isolate the device from networks. 

I have used Falcon for two years.

I rate Falcon nine out of 10 for stability. 

I rate Falcon eight out of 10 for scalability. 

I rate CrowdStrike Falcon nine out of 10. 

Due to compliance requirements, our organization utilizes CrowdStrike Falcon as our Endpoint Detection and Response solution. This decision was particularly driven by the need to address a surge of ransomware attacks within our environment, experiencing between ten and 15 incidents at the time. The implementation of an EDR solution became crucial for effectively responding to these threats.

Our existing system lacked real-time monitoring and visibility, causing detection delays of even several minutes. CrowdStrike addressed this by offering near-instantaneous detection across the entire system. Furthermore, it allows for manual or automated response actions, significantly improving our overall incident response speed.

Integrating CrowdStrike Falcon with other solutions such as our SIEM was easy.

The key aspect of CrowdStrike Falcon is its behavioral detection approach. Unlike traditional signature-based platforms that rely on pre-defined patterns, Falcon analyzes an application's behavior to identify and respond to threats much faster. This makes it lightweight and minimizes impact on system performance. The sandbox feature is also valuable, while it incurs an additional cost, it can be valuable for deeper investigation.

The UI is not efficient. We are required to dig down to get more information, jumping from screen to screen.

I have been using CrowdStrike Falcon for three and a half years.

CrowdStrike Falcon generally ran smoothly with minimal lag.

CrowdStrike Falcon meets our scaling needs. To increase usage we simply add more agents.

Frustrated by CrowdStrike's slow and inconsistent technical support, we ended up having more success researching and resolving the issue ourselves.

Neutral

Leveraging the cloud platform, the initial deployment was straightforward. We simply needed to activate and deploy the agents. While configuration for a seasoned professional only took one to two hours, the entire deployment process typically takes a couple of days.

CrowdStrike Falcon can be more expensive than some competitors, and its base price doesn't cover every feature. For instance, adding sandboxing for advanced malware analysis incurs an extra cost.

We evaluated CrowdStrike and SentinelOne. However, since we bought the CrowdStrike, we did not move forward with SentinelOne.

CrowdStrike stands out for its superior threat detection speed, lightweight agents that don't impact system performance, and its helpful recommendations for responding to threats. This combination allows us to swiftly stop even unknown threats in their tracks.

I would rate CrowdStrike Falcon eight out of ten.

Two engineers max are required for maintenance.

We have 5,000 CrowdStrike Falcon users within our organization.

CrowdStrike Falcon utilizes a behavioral approach to security, proactively identifying threats based on their actions rather than relying on pre-defined signatures. This allows for faster response times compared to traditional signature-based systems.

A popular choice for Data Loss Prevention is CrowdStrike Falcon. This is the primary function our clients leverage it for, as it offers industry-leading DLP capabilities.

CrowdStrike Falcon has helped our customers secure their confidential data.

The DLP is the most valuable feature of CrowdStrike Falcon. Additionally, the scanning is good and the deployment is easy.

The console is not user-friendly or visually appealing and has room for improvement. I would like a single pane of glass dashboard.

I have been an integrator of CrowdStrike Falcon for one day. 

CrowdStrike Falcon is stable.

I have also worked with Trend Micro and Panda.

The initial deployment is straightforward. I would rate the ease of setup nine out of ten.

Two people are required for the deployment.

I need to upgrade the software occasionally but it doesn't require continuous maintenance.

While the specific deployment time varies depending on each client's individual environment, on average the process can be completed in a couple of days.

I only deploy the solution for clients, I don't calculate their ROI.

CrowdStrike Falcon's pricing is reasonable. We can customize features and that affects the pricing.

We pay 40,000 dirhams per 100 users.

I would rate CrowdStrike Falcon nine out of ten.

Our clientele ranges from small to enterprise-level businesses.

I recommend CrowdStrike Falcon as it provides all the features of an EDR.

We use the product for cloud security. We use it for prevention, to watch for gaps in security. We work with customers seeking prevention for advanced apps. 

Sometimes a customer has multiple solutions that come at a higher cost. They have to pay for all of these other security features. With CrowdStrike, customers get one agent for all system operations. It offers more security for remote work and clients gain access to the latest protections.

The solution offers good features. The prevention and device control are useful. It offers helpful firewall management and identity protection.

They've reduced the complexity and provide better security outcomes. Customers tend to prefer CrowdStrike. 

It's easy to deploy and manage.

The solution isn't known in my market. The brand isn't as recognizable. Their shortcomings are more on the marketing side. Everyone knows Microsoft Defender. Customers need to hear more about CrowdStrike and all the advantages and features on offer. 

We've used the solution for three to four months. 

I haven't had any issues with bugs or glitches. I haven't had a problem with stability so far. 

The capability to scale so far has been good. 

Technical support is good. 

Positive

I'm also familiar with Microsoft Defender. However, Defender works best with Microsoft and not necessarily other legacy applications. With CrowdStrike, you can secure all system operations and versions. It's easier to deploy and operate. 

The deployment is seamless and users get immediate protection. It's lightweight. There's one agent deployed to endpoints in minutes. The product offers consistent coverage. There's no complex integrations and it doesn't need fine-tuning. In comparison, Defender can be more complex.

CrowdStrike can be deployed on any operating system, not just Microsoft. 

There isn't really maintenance, it's set and forget. The agent updates automatically and receives continuous security updates, enabling immediate enforcement across endpoints. 

The solution is well worth the cost.

The costs are predictable. There are no surprises. 

In Chile, there are not a lot of CrowdStrike partners of the managed service; therefore, it's a little more expensive than Microsoft, as there are so many more managed partners for Microsoft. That said, if you look at the total cost of ownership, CrowStrike is better than Microsoft.

We're a reseller. We're still new to CrowdStrike. 

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. The cost is good and they offer better tech support. Also, the protection is wonderful.