I mainly use it for data integration and some API tasks.

External reviews
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Reusability and control have improved data integration processes with responsive support
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
I find the reusability and the snaps to be very valuable features. There are quite a lot of snaps that are pre-delivered and available for use. The level of control in terms of the granularity of process control is quite good.
I also like the whole child-parent pipeline feature; it allows me to break up a process into smaller pieces and then have one big pipeline that controls these smaller pipelines.
What needs improvement?
I am quite happy with the solution and do not have specific requirements at the moment. I tend to frequently communicate with SnapLogic to ask for additional features, and they have been responsive. While new features are always welcome, I do not have anything else at the top of my mind currently.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have used the solution for three or four years.
How are customer service and support?
I would rate customer service an eight and a half out of ten.
How was the initial setup?
For me, the initial setup is simple. I have used both an on-premises solution and the platform-as-a-service option, and both are quite straightforward.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The setup cost would be four or five. There would be only one point of improvement if the price could be lower.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I considered MuleSoft and found SnapLogic to be cheaper and their offering to be a lot less complex. There is not a lot of pricing, processing, the number of things, or other complicated aspects.
What other advice do I have?
I can recommend SnapLogic to other users and the product overall. Overall product rating is nine out of ten.
Snaplogic offre une expérience d'intégration de données transparente.
Meilleur outil pour l'intégration
Meilleur outil à intégrer
Un des meilleurs services d'intégration sur le marché.
Achieves rapid results in data migration and has an intuitive user interface
What is our primary use case?
I utilize SnapLogic for data migration and data integration projects. I use it mainly as a middleware tool, working with a lot of SAP data. By transferring SAP data into more cost-effective databases, I can run analytics without the high cost associated with SAP provider analytics.
What is most valuable?
I find SnapLogic to be user-friendly, especially for beginners with limited experience in data engineering or ETL. The interface is interactive, allowing me to quickly learn how to run pipelines and achieve production-ready results swiftly. This agility translates to cost savings, especially for smaller projects and proofs of concept, as less time and effort are needed to deliver results.
What needs improvement?
SnapLogic is doing well in evolving with the AI landscape. However, if the AI capabilities and integrations were more intuitive and easy to learn for new users, it would be greatly beneficial.
Additionally, improving AI capabilities to be easily recognizable would enhance the user experience.
For how long have I used the solution?
Although my use of SnapLogic has been intermittent, I have worked with it for close to seven years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I would rate the stability of SnapLogic as nearly ten out of ten. It has shown to be robust and reliable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I rate the scalability of SnapLogic as eight out of ten. While it performs well, there is some room for improvement in this area.
How are customer service and support?
The technical support from SnapLogic is excellent, and I would give it a complete ten. They are prompt in responding to inquiries or issues, providing quick solutions.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have used DBT along with Airflow as part of our current cloud data integration.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup of SnapLogic has become very easy, comfortable, and swift.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
SnapLogic is positioned at around seven or eight out of ten in terms of pricing. There are competitors offering competitive pricing in the market.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
DBT is a main competitor of SnapLogic. For enterprise-level solutions, I prefer DBT, yet for smaller internal projects, SnapLogic is more efficient.
What other advice do I have?
Overall, I would rate SnapLogic as nine out of ten. I recommend SnapLogic for other users due to its efficiency and user-friendly features. Medium and large-scale enterprises will benefit most from SnapLogic as small-scale businesses usually rely more on open-source options. I rated my overall experience with SnapLogic as nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Plateforme polyvalente et complète avec une large gamme de fonctionnalités.
Polyvalent et capable, cher et manquant de certaines fonctionnalités
De très bonnes possibilités de faire le lien entre les infrastructures cloud et sur site.
Des produits stables, avoir des nœuds sans interface utilisateur est un avantage lors de la mise en œuvre, facile à mettre à l'échelle et à déplacer les nœuds si nécessaire.
L'extensibilité avec des snaps personnalisés est également positive, où les partenaires peuvent étendre avec de nouvelles fonctionnalités.
Le support client revient en temps opportun et aide à résoudre les problèmes et à fournir des correctifs.
Nous utilisons le produit pour de nombreuses intégrations différentes en continu, les flux critiques pour l'entreprise fonctionnent bien.
Je préférerais avoir la possibilité de structurer chaque intégration dans un "accord" qui pourrait regrouper la détection à partir du sondage des canaux d'entrée, les étapes de transformation (pipelines) et éventuellement les étapes d'envoi/sortie.
Dans la configuration actuelle, nous devons construire des consommateurs de files d'attente de messages, des sondeurs de fichiers et d'autres canaux d'entrée dans des pipelines qui fonctionnent soit en continu et allouent beaucoup de ressources et de créneaux (en raison de nombreux sous-pipelines dans le flux) soit sont exécutés selon des horaires.
Il serait bon de sortir et d'ajouter la possibilité d'avoir des canaux d'entrée légers qui peuvent consommer de toutes les sources possibles (peut-être basés sur des pipelines) et ensuite acheminer les données récupérées dans des accords/pipelines d'intégration spécifiques basés sur des règles de détection.
Je préférerais avoir plus de support pour les tests unitaires des pipelines, comme créer des cas de test pour les pipelines ou des parties de pipelines qui pourraient être utilisés pour valider après que des modifications soient effectuées afin de renforcer davantage les déploiements sûrs en production.
C'est un peu lent à traiter et à développer, nous avons de longs temps de traitement des validations, ce qui n'est pas très efficace pendant le développement.
Renforcer davantage l'intégration avec git et d'autres contrôles de source.
Activer le support pour sauvegarder les données en dehors de snaplogic dans la solution.
Support de connectivité avec de nombreux produits standard.
Facilité de développement et partiellement pour le dépannage avec l'activation de la validation et la possibilité d'analyser les données à chaque étape.