Our use case is for real-time data integration. It was a preferred tool for this purpose. Additionally, we employed Azure EventHub, another service, as an indicator for real-time data in a couple of larger programs focused on integrating real-time data and visualization.
External reviews
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Amazing
The customer support is also very good.
The nhmber of features also are increasing.
An Azure Marketplace offering that provides Apache Kafka as a service
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
Kafka and Confluent Cloud have proven to be cost-effective, especially when compared to other tools. In a recent BI integration program over the past year, we assessed multiple use cases spanning ship-to-shore and various Azure integrations. Our findings revealed that Confluent Kafka performed exceptionally well, standing out alongside Genesys and Azure Event Hubs. While these three are top contenders, the choice among other tools depends on the specific use case and project requirements.
The customer initially used tools like SMQs, FITRA, and Stream for real-time data processing. However, after our recommendation, Confluent Cloud proved to be a superior choice, capable of replacing these three tools and simplifying their data infrastructure. This shift to a single tool, Confluent Cloud, streamlined their operations, making maintenance and management more efficient for their internal projects.
What needs improvement?
Regarding real-time data usage, there were challenges with CDC (Change Data Capture) integrations. Specifically, with PyTRAN, we encountered difficulties. We recommended using our on-premises Kaspersky as an alternative to PyTRAN for that specific use case due to issues with CDC store configuration and log reading challenges with the iton components.
For how long have I used the solution?
We implemented this solution approximately a year and a half ago for significant projects.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I would rate the stability 8 out of 10.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I would rate the scalability 8 out of 10.
How was the initial setup?
I haven't personally implemented it. The recommendation was made during a consulting program based on a thorough assessment of the tool's capabilities, connectors, and services. However, there hasn't been direct implementation on-site.
What other advice do I have?
While most of the capabilities meet current organizational needs, the pricing is slightly higher. Companies need to consider this aspect in their decision-making process, given the managed and comparatively higher price point. I would rate it an eight due to its capabilities and CDC integrations. It stands out as a top tool that can replace others for real-time data integration processes. The CIBC capability has the potential to handle EDCs effectively. While I assume the support is good for out-of-the-box challenges, I'm not certain about the cost. Overall, I believe it's a strong choice with a rating of eight.
The Ease of doing things on cloud.
Also, Confluent can help organizations reduce costs by improving the efficiency of their data processing and reducing the need for expensive data storage solutions.
Knowledge hub / storage
One of the best managed platform for Kafka
2.The platform serves as a unified solution for real-time data pipelines, applications, and microservices.Offers a wide range of features in the enterprise edition for reliable and scalable real-time data management.
3. Easy integration with various software solutions, contributing to a significant increase in usage. Schema Registry exports, Prometheus monitoring tools are Valuable .Impressive API integrations and support for Infrastructure as Code (IaaC) through Terraform.
4. Confluent's support has proven to be time-saving and enhances developer productivity.
Key highlights: reliable Kafka clusters, schema registry for message reliability, user-friendly web interface.
2.Schema exporter is not fully supported in Terraform.
3.Some Confluent documents are outdated, requiring external searches and Stack Overflow for issue resolution.Documentation, especially on deployment, is not up to par and is not beginner-friendly.
4. The overall learning curve is high, requiring knowledge of Kafka, connectors, and security.
Awesome
Excellent documentation
Good Data streaming architecture
2. On the spot security matrix capable enough to carry 50million + counts
3. AI enhanced enterprise security
2. Mircoservices integration are still lathargic