I mainly use Automation Anywhere to automate operations, and our main use case is processing banking transactions that are captured at the banking front end in the retail office, and then automated in the back end.

What I appreciate the most about Automation Anywhere is the ease of use and the flexibility that we have, being able to create bots very fast. It is very easy and friendly to develop. That is the main aspect of it.

The benefits of Automation Anywhere to my company include significant time savings and reduction in workforce requirements. While I do not have a general number, in the main process, we are saving approximately five to six full-time employees that we would otherwise have to employ to do this specific task.

The main challenge I was looking to solve with Robotic Process Automation is that RPA has some limitations since the software we automate changes continuously. We are looking into AI to enable applications that automate it.

In the age of Generative AI, the biggest challenge for me and my company is the learning process. AI governance is going to be very important in my company as we are a highly regulated business. It is not very advanced in terms of AI regulation, although we have it in our minds.

I am currently in a project to use Document Automation in my process; we are currently developing it. It is not yet in production, however, that is our main project currently. It has not yet impacted my efficiency.

Automation Anywhere can be improved in terms of complex logic implementation. While the application is very easy to use, we find that programming complex business logic could be better integrated into the native tool.

I have been using Automation Anywhere for five years.

This is the first solution I am using.

The deployment was good.

I am happy with the pricing, the setup costs, and the licensing; I do not have any problems.

I considered other solutions as part of the process. I cannot specify which ones, however, it is part of the banking process to evaluate several tools before choosing one.

I have not used the autopilot capability of Automation Anywhere yet. Regarding the Automation Anywhere Center of Excellence or COE manager, we have a project to start using it, however, we are not currently using it for the purpose.

I would rate Automation Anywhere a nine out of ten.

My use cases include technical service, finance, and IT ops.

What I appreciate the most about Automation Anywhere is its ease of use. The ease of use helps my company by allowing us to roll out automations quickly.

The main challenge I was looking to solve with the agentic process automation, is that we don't have any agentic process automation yet. In the age of agentic AI, probably the biggest challenges for me and my company are determining which direction to head and settling on the right path. Automation Anywhere can help me with that. It depends on the price point; currently, the pricing is a bit high. I am just on the RPA. I have not had a chance to try out the AI agent studio feature of Automation Anywhere yet.

AI governance is very important for my company in general. It is important due to safeguards, making sure that there are appropriate guardrails in place so it does not give proprietary information outside the company.

I utilize Automation Anywhere Center of Excellence manager or CoE manager. My impression of its impact on visibility in the automation lifecycle is so-so; it has good points and bad points, and I have discussed with Automation Anywhere several of the other shortfalls as well as the positives.

We are using the cloud-based nature of Automation Anywhere CoE manager in managing our automation pipeline. I use it to track the progress of various ideas, the solicitation of ideas from our population of managers, as well as to track a couple of projects against our initial goals. We do use document automation in our current processes, yet not in production as we are in the process of one project that's being developed right now.

One way Automation Anywhere can be improved is in ticketing; I have a couple of tickets that have been outstanding for a while, and the support staff have closed tickets without checking with me first, which has been a sore spot.

I have been using Automation Anywhere for five months.

I used Microsoft Power Automate before choosing Automation Anywhere.

My experience with the deployment has been very good. 

My experience with the pricing, the setup costs, and the licensing of the platform has been good with the bots, as well as the support package, but the price points on the agentic side and AI side are rather high.

I did consider other solutions before choosing this one, including UiPath. I went with Automation Anywhere because it was a coin toss between the two, but Automation Anywhere had a better price point.

I switched to Automation Anywhere since it is a better product. 

From one to ten, I would rate Automation Anywhere probably about an eight.

Our main use cases for Automation Anywhere are anything that's end-to-end automations. We initially used to do finance and HR only, however, eventually graduated to different verticals and departments. Our use cases have been predominantly high-value, high ROI, and anything that can be repeatable, algorithmic, and automated.

Automation Anywhere has significantly improved our ability to automate both standard and complex business processes. Initially, we focused on traditional rule-based automation to streamline end-to-end workflows in functions like finance and HR, which delivered strong ROI.

More recently, we’ve expanded into HyperAutomation where we have used Automation Anywhere to orchestrate the end to end AI solutions. These tools have allowed us to tackle tasks that previously required manual intervention by enabling role-based, persona-driven agents that make near human-level decisions with human oversight 

One of the most valuable features of Automation Anywhere is its low-code/no-code framework, which enables us to quickly build reusable automation templates. This has made it easier for both developers and citizen developers to scale automation across teams.

As a cloud-native platform, it offers an intuitive and accessible development experience, which has accelerated adoption and reduced infrastructure overhead.

While the platform’s features and enterprise support have been excellent, one area for improvement is greater flexibility in packaging and pricing. It would be helpful to have more modular options that allow us to selectively license features based on our needs without committing to the full suite.

This would improve cost efficiency and make it easier to align the platform’s capabilities with our automation strategy as it evolves.

I have been using Automation Anywhere for over ten years. I play different roles in consulting, being within the product, and trying to be the implementer, leading to multiple implementations.

I would rate the stability and availability of Automation Anywhere at 9 out of 10. Since moving to the cloud platform, we’ve experienced minimal downtime, and overall reliability has been excellent. It’s one of the most stable enterprise automation platforms we’ve worked with.

Automation Anywhere has scaled well with our evolving business needs. We've been able to expand usage by adding more creators and runners as required, and the licensing process has been straightforward and efficient. The platform has supported both incremental growth and larger strategic shifts without friction, which gives us confidence in its ability to scale further as our automation footprint grows.

I would rate Automation Anywhere support a seven out of ten. Enhancing the support tiers might be beneficial, and pricing has been a primary challenge, with a need for cheaper options and more tiered support.

We do not have premium support. While we possess a basic support package that has been really good, we are considering premium support packages for the future, however, we have received ample assistance from Automation Anywhere for critical issues we've faced.

Positive

We previously used earlier versions of Automation Anywhere, and during our transition from v11 to A360, we evaluated the improvements through a series of proof-of-concepts. What stood out was the enhanced developer experience, broader connector support, and the overall seamlessness of development and deployment in A360 compared to prior versions. These improvements solidified our decision to continue with Automation Anywhere as our automation platform of choice.

Straightforward, and we were able to apply all templates and best practices when we rolled out the solution internally

Mix of both internal as well as vendor team. Vendor experience has been great

We've seen strong ROI from Automation Anywhere in two main areas. First, traditional automation has helped us streamline end-to-end processes in functions like finance and HR, resulting in measurable operational efficiency. Second, AI orchestration has allowed us to manage and scale multiple AI-driven use cases effectively, extending the impact of automation beyond rule-based tasks.

While we can't share specific metrics, the overall value—in terms of time savings, consistency, and scalability—has been significant.

In our experience, setup and licensing with Automation Anywhere have been smooth and straightforward. Our vendor management team worked closely with a partner and Automation Anywhere to handle licensing, and the cloud-based setup was efficiently managed by their team. We've used the platform for over 4 years without any major licensing or deployment issues.

N/A

N/A

Our primary use cases with Automation Anywhere revolve around process discovery, where we've used that with many clients to identify areas of opportunity for automation, map those out, and build the core automation to drive the new modernized processes. We originally had done a fair amount of work with robotic process automation types of opportunities in and around revenue cycle with health system clients, ensuring that they get paid appropriately for the services they render.

One of the really interesting use cases that moving into agentic automation brings to the table are more complex use cases, where we can work with things such as medical necessity denials, where payers will deny or downgrade the payment that they provide to the health systems based on a set of medical necessity criteria. 

The introduction of the agentic capabilities allows us to ingest that denial letter, along with the criteria for medical necessity that's required to be met to be paid, and then work with the medical record itself, so the agent can scan the medical record to find out why it's denied matching to the criteria that's required to support it and determine if the criteria are met. If so, it can then draft a letter. 

Traditionally, that's been a highly manual process that requires a clinical resource, which tends to be very expensive, and they can do only about 10 a day or 50 a week. With this kind of automation, the draft letter is provided to them for review and confirmation, allowing them to increase productivity by multiples across the impact and giving them the opportunity to work more effectively in terms of the span of denials, because most health systems never even get to all of them, determining whether they'll take the time to do it based on labor intensity.

With all the things happening with AI in the market right now, one of the big challenges that clients have is ensuring the quality. There are fears around AI that people have about whether the AI will hallucinate and those kinds of things. Having a partner like Automation Anywhere, a company that is known in the industry, is a leader in the industry, brings a lot of credibility to how people look to solve those problems and drive that comfort level. 

Customers also are looking for the kinds of solutions that help enable their workforces to be more effective. Agentic capabilities bring a lot to that. If you think about not just the traditional labor savings, but how you can elevate the performance of the employees that will still be there, the agentic AI brings a lot to the table for those kinds of solutions as well.

Some of the really impactful features of working with Automation Anywhere are the ability to design and partner with their experts to come up with our solutions. Often, we're trying to push the envelope on how either a process has worked traditionally, and trying to see how the automation solutions can change the nature of that process. Automation Anywhere has been a fantastic partner to work through different ways and try different methods and approaches to solving those problems.

Document automation often comes up with our clients, where the processes we're working in still transfer faxes and other traditional documents that must be uploaded, with data extracted and input into a process, whether that's faxes for scheduling appointments or things such as benefit determination, sometimes following up on authorizations for services. Document automation is a really important feature and component to solving these problems.

In terms of areas for improvement and opportunity, Automation Anywhere has been a great partner for us. Many of our clients would want to see scalability in pricing, and while I could say cheaper, that's part of it. Finding creative and scalable pricing structures is important, especially with the move toward agentive automation, which presents challenges in getting clients on board. Clients are interested but reluctant, needing proofs of concept with minimal upfront cost or risk to demonstrate value. 

Additionally, there's potential for Automation Anywhere to integrate conversational types of tools and AI into their tool set, which would be really valuable.

We have been working with Automation Anywhere for several years and we are a partner with them, using them to support many of our solutions for clients, helping to modernize their workforce and bring the digital workforce concept to life with our clients.

In terms of reliability and stability, I have personally found Automation Anywhere to be a highly reliable and stable product, well-known in the market for that.

Many of our clients are just moving into automation, and one of the benefits with Automation Anywhere is the ability to scale and add processes as we improve concepts, helping them get comfortable with the technology while driving more value through expanded automations.

We've received great support from Automation Anywhere. We've developed some new innovative solutions with them requiring significant work from their engineering teams and their partner teams. They've been a great partner to gently vet our ideas, and they're willing to give them a try, which has been excellent.

Positive

Very few of our clients at this stage have agentic process automation in place, so in those cases, Automation Anywhere is our preferred partner. 

As we work with clients in identifying opportunities and positioning a solution, Automation Anywhere becomes an easy decision for them. In the traditional RPA space, while some clients may have other vendors, many do not have anything in place. We often work through how to move to the Automation Anywhere platform, which is made easier by their good job of facilitating the switch from other platforms.

The return on investment for our clients working with Automation Anywhere solutions typically shows at least three or four times in the first year and sometimes double that in outer years, arising from a combination of labor savings, improved quality, and reduction in process failures.

Some of the benefits that we've seen with our clients are substantial labor savings of 30% to 70%, depending on the processes that we often see in the ability to reduce labor costs. 

We see improved quality and the elimination of process failures, which can lead to multi-million dollar savings in things such as denials with our clients, addressing how much they're writing off that they can't collect from third parties. 

The elimination of process failures is a significant opportunity for savings, with typical savings being millions, if not tens of millions, for many of our clients due to areas such as insurance verifications, failure to get authorizations, and timely follow-ups on claims to ensure that we submit the required information to the payers.

With all the things happening with AI in the market right now, one of the big challenges that clients have is ensuring the quality, with fears about whether the AI will hallucinate, and those kinds of things. Having a partner like Automation Anywhere, which is known in the industry as a leader, brings a lot of credibility to how people look to solve those problems and drive comfort. They also seek solutions that help enable their workforces to be more effective, and agentive capabilities bring a lot to that. If you think about not just the traditional labor savings, but how to elevate the performance of employees that will still be there, agentive AI brings a lot to the table for those kinds of solutions as well.

On a scale of one to ten, I would give Automation Anywhere an eight depending on the day. They've been a great partner for us in developing new solutions, and when we've deployed them, we see high reliability. The brand is well-respected in the market, making clients receptive to the name and bringing credibility to our solutions. Overall, I give them high marks and enjoy working with them.

In my company, we're using Automation Anywhere to send statements to customers and then we're also using it to reach out to our vendors if their promised dates go past due, so we can get updated ones and keep that active in our system.

From using Automation Anywhere, my company has seen that with the statements going out, it's helped substantially with getting cash in. Before, we had to manually send emails or make phone calls to customers when their AR went past due. The bot executing every single day really helped with reliability. We saw increased cash flows almost instantly.

What I appreciate the most about Automation Anywhere is that it's reliable. It executes every day and works consistently. We set up a schedule and everything is easy to add to the queue. Reliability is definitely the biggest advantage because we experimented with Power Automate, and it was buggy. It wasn't nearly as reliable as Automation Anywhere.

Automation Anywhere is helping with automation adoption. It's proven to increase our revenue stream.

One aspect I don't appreciate about Automation Anywhere is the way variables are handled. Many things seem to become a string, which makes it hard to code and keep track of items when everything's a string. Different variable types and making the variables more simple to establish and use would be really helpful. That's my main concern regarding how the variables are handled.

To make Automation Anywhere a perfect ten, the variable management could be simpler. Additionally, more direct plugins would be beneficial. We use Business Central. Currently, we're using Great Plains as our ERP, moving to Business Central. I've noticed there aren't any direct plugins for Business Central, as there are for Workday. That would be beneficial to have.

I've been using Automation Anywhere for two years.

I didn't use another solution before choosing Automation Anywhere. We went directly to Automation Anywhere. We experimented with Power Automate, but it was buggy, and we didn't proceed far with that. I jumped into Automation Anywhere almost immediately.

My experience with the deployment of Automation Anywhere was good. I have no complaints there. It was very straightforward.

With the cash flow generated just on the one bot we had operating, it's paid for itself in the first month. It's reasonable for what it provides since hiring someone to do that job would cost more than that in a year. It's cheaper than an employee and more reliable.

My experience with the pricing, setup costs, and licensing of Automation Anywhere is that it's reasonable. We were paying approximately $30,000 for a year license.

I've looked at UiPath as a consideration but didn't explore it extensively. The differences I've noticed between UiPath and Automation Anywhere is that UiPath was a bit less user-friendly from a development standpoint. I didn't examine it too deeply, which might be because it's a more powerful tool. We already had Automation Anywhere at that point. I was just trying to compare what development looks on both sides.

I'm still determining what the main challenge I am looking to solve with an agentic process automation. We have many areas that still need to be covered.

In the age of agentic AI, the biggest challenges for me and my company are adoption and implementation costs. It's expensive for licensing and development. We definitely want to implement these things, however, we need to do it piece by piece. We're trying to address low-hanging fruit to create revenue that will pay for future bots and agentic AI.

I haven't utilized the AI Agent Studio. 

AI governance is important for my company, however, we haven't implemented anything with AI yet. When we get there, it will be of high importance. Still, there's nothing formal currently. 

I don't utilize Automation Anywhere COE or Center of Excellence Manager directly. 

I don't utilize document automation in my current processes, although I'd want to.

I rate Automation Anywhere an 8 out of 10.

Our primary use case for Automation Anywhere began with order processing, specifically the order-to-cash process, where we manually enter orders from the customer through PDFs and other methods. 

We started from four bots and have grown to close to 60 bots at this point, expanding significantly from two or three processes to ten times that scale over the last five or six years.

Our document automation, specifically with IQ Bot as part of the automation, has significantly improved efficiency and proficiency, allowing us to be currently engaged in proof of concept initiatives aimed at further advancing the document automation process with generative AI.

Document automation has indeed been beneficial in handling large volumes of documents in our organization, where we process product-related data sheets that range from 80 to 120 pages, efficiently extracting data that would take a human several hours to read manually. I can confidently say that document automation saves us time, as it takes human effort significantly down from five to seven minutes manually per PO. It is being executed much faster by the bots.

One of the notable benefits we've realized from Automation Anywhere is a significant reduction in errors when processing data, which improves both revenue accuracy and operational efficiency.

In the age of agentic AI, the big challenge is moving to the next step. We are currently running all RPAs now. So robotic automation is the key for us now, and we are moving to the next generation of automation, which is agentic processing. We need a helping hand to make sure that our company strategy and the goal can be achieved with this agentic automation. This year, we have had a big push from our leaders to be involved, more and more, on agentic processing. That's a focus for us. 

As we evolve from RPA to APA, we are at the early stages. We're just moving over. The first step we are taking is a document automation with AI capability on top of it. That's our first step that we are doing at this point of time. Eventually, we'll get there, but it's really early.

We are using some AI. There are 20 to 30 tools at this point. So we are trying to bring in Automation Anywhere into one of those ten. It's in the evaluation phase at this point. There's a big team working on it. We want to get the right tool both legally and via a vetting process before we can bring any tool into the company. That's an ongoing process. 

Automation Anywhere can be improved by integrating self-correction capabilities into the bots, particularly as we develop RPA, where changes in environment paths require additional redeveloping efforts.

We've used the solution for around five to six years. 

There have been no downtime issues since we migrated to cloud. The availability has been good. 

Automation Anywhere is scaling well. 

As we aim to keep up with current technology trends, we are working on enhancing our growth rate moving forward.

We have around 2500 people worldwide.

The support from Automation Anywhere has been outstanding, with timely responses to submitted tickets and effective resolutions for issues that have arisen.

Positive

Prior to adopting Automation Anywhere, we used B2B automation for a long time for our needs, and the limitations of other tools in handling complex PDF transactions were significant factors that prompted us to consider a change.

I was significantly involved in the deployment of Automation Anywhere, being the sole person from my company starting this automation journey, and we faced some initial challenges, particularly with hardware setup when we transitioned from on-premises to cloud, which eventually became smoother.

I've seen a return on investment with Automation Anywhere, as we've measured time saved, starting from 50 days per quarter to about 1500 days per quarter with the deployment of bots, equating to substantial human time savings.

The pricing is average. It's not an expensive tool. The pricing is mid-range.

Before selecting Automation Anywhere, we considered several tools including UiPath, which we had set up for financial functions and Kofax for SAP automation, but ultimately chose Automation Anywhere for its scalability across the company.

For companies considering Automation Anywhere, my advice is to prioritize identifying and automating the most critical processes rather than trying to automate everything, ensuring that a thorough study backs these decisions to maximize support from leadership and demonstrate success. 

We are not utilizing Automation Anywhere COE manager, but we have developed our in-house COE manager since we started the process independently in 2019.

On a scale of one to ten, I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

We implement Automation Anywhere for our customers or for our clients, but we also use it internally for our own processes too.

We're in a growth phase, so this solution helps us scale and standarize processes so we can do more with less. 

The low-code platform is pretty easy to learn, especially if you have come from a technical background. Then you can build quite a few powerful automations with it already with the traditional RPA in terms of the flexibility it gives you. 

There are additional features, such as document automation, that expand the scope in terms of what you can use it for. It's a great multi-tool. Every piece of it works really great. 

For us, the features of Automation Anywhere help us scale our automations and standardize our processes. We are able to do more with less, and that's been the key for us in terms of using the platform.

In our automation processes, we are utilizing the AI Agent Studio mostly in our training. We haven't fully rolled out any live automations yet. That's something we'll implement very soon. The integration features of Automation Anywhere are flexible in terms of what you can connect to. You can bring it over lens or use what's available, which gives a lot of flexibility in terms of how you can use the platform.

We have explored the autopilot capability of IQ Bot AI, and it's maturing. We are keeping an eye on it to determine if it can speed up the development work for us. We are definitely curious and will continue to explore as the product evolves.

We utilize Automation Anywhere's CoE Center of Excellence Manager. Its impact on visibility in the automation lifecycle is actually very important. It shows the complete lifecycle of opportunities, from what's in pipeline to what's been deployed, and how those deployments are performing in production.

In the age of agentic AI, it's allowing us to imagine what comes next.

My impression of the AI governance features in maintaining compliance and data integrity in our company so far is positive. Though we haven't rolled out anything actively yet, from what I see, it gives quite a granular level of control in terms of what can be done and how different outputs can be controlled. AI governance is very important to our company, and while the AI Agent Studio's compliance feature might not be as mature, there are security requirements around keeping our customer data safe and secure.

The availability of material in terms of more technical documentation could be improved, particularly in-depth information about how things can be done. I'm not saying it's not available at this time, but there's always scope in terms of playbooks, especially with APA coming out, as things can be done differently than traditional methods. It would be beneficial to have standardized playbooks that we can use to understand change management, position this to our leadership, and demonstrate the art of what's possible. Some playbooks of that kind, especially on the execution level, would be nice.

I have been using Automation Anywhere for about five years.

Before adopting Automation Anywhere, we haven't really used other solutions. 

What I appreciate the most about Automation Anywhere is that it's pretty flexible in terms of standing it up. You don't have to have a whole lot of infrastructure setup that's required for it.

It has not yet influenced our automation programs and we're not really tracking the level of return on investments.

My experience with the pricing, the setup costs, and the licensing of the Automation Anywhere platform is that it's pretty competitive.

We do test different solutions to see how they are in the market. They don't necessarily have with Automation Anywhere offers. 

Automation Anywhere helps us overcome operational challenges. Especially with what's been announced recently, the solution expands a lot more beyond what was typically possible so far. I'm looking forward to checking it out in practice and seeing how much we can push the platform. 

We've just started with APA, so we don't have anything rolled out yet, however, we are looking forward to actively using it.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. Within any solution, there is always room for improvement. They seem to be going through a maturity phase. The foundation is strong. 

We have many use cases. We have 200 bots, and we are doing extensive order management. We work at Cargill, so they do a lot of order management type of bots, but there are many different types of bots for all industries.

With Automation Anywhere, the features we are using help to remove tasks that humans are not good at, such as repetitive tasks. It's this type of task that people don't want to do. With intensive repetitive work, it's prone to human errors. That's what is helping us. It first motivates people not to do this type of work, so they can focus more on the customer and work on things that are more engaging. Additionally, it reduces the errors.

The main challenge that we are trying to solve with agentive process automation is business rules. We have many bots that have complex business rules, and these business rules are usually hard coded.

I joined my company, Cargill, in 2018, and since then, they have been using Automation Anywhere. I have been six years working with Automation Anywhere.

The main complaint with Automation Anywhere is when they release features that they don't have ready.

Positive

I did use another solution before choosing Automation Anywhere for the first time. In the past, we had UiPath as well. Also, when I worked for Hewlett-Packard, we were using WinAutomation, which is the one that Microsoft is using now for Power Automate desktop.

The pricing, setup cost, and licensing of the platform are the worst. This is my major concern and complaint.

I have considered other solutions. We are working with Power Platform, which is another vendor we are using at Cargill. We did an analysis last year on cost for the long term. If it works, we might change to that platform in the future.

In the age of agentive AI, the biggest challenge for me and my company is that there are many vendors and companies offering the same thing, which gets complicated and confusing.

I would rate Automation Anywhere overall a nine out of ten.

My use case involves day-to-day work automation in document handling, as I am from an organization where most of the work relates to documents, specifically unstructured data. We are utilizing this document automation feature in Automation Anywhere predominantly for handling this unstructured data. That's one kind of use case for me. 

Secondly, report generation is crucial since the finance team needs to generate lots of reports in a day or week, which involves integration with SAP as well as Salesforce. These integrations also have automation in place, but work mainly happens in Salesforce and SAP, and at the end of the process, a report is pushed to their department head for further validation. 

The use case of document handling is complemented by a dedicated help desk team that manages customer support using an engineering ticketing tool, where they use Automation Anywhere for logging tickets and updating the status on a timely basis. So, those are the main use cases for us of Automation Anywhere.

Document automation has notably reduced manual effort. In a day, we process at least 100 to 150 documents, so manual effort would take a day or half a day. However, since implementing Automation Anywhere, the amount of manual effort required has significantly decreased. There are validations to perform, but they only need to spend a maximum of one or two hours on validations. If there's no validation needed, it could take zero time. Thus, in terms of time savings, we consider this a significant improvement. 

Regarding cost savings, we had a dedicated help desk team that initially had 10 to 15 employees, but after implementing automation, almost all ticket logging and updates have become automated, reducing the need for manpower for these activities.

The improvement I have seen with Automation Anywhere particularly stems from the transition from IQ Bot to DA, which was a significant step in unstructured document handling. The amount of processing and accuracy has increased significantly with the introduction of document automation. Furthermore, the newly introduced agent-based automation feature holds promise, although we have not directly worked on that as a project yet.

The best features in Automation Anywhere include document automation, which has replaced IQ Bot, which was challenging to manage. We recently switched to document automation that comes with the bundle. It is a good feature because earlier, we needed to purchase a separate license for IQ Bot, but now the enterprise license includes the DA license. This eliminates the need for an additional license for document automation. 

Additionally, there is enhanced integration with AI and ML, leading to significant reductions in the workload for processing unstructured documents. The time taken and accuracy have improved greatly with DA, and the recent introduction of agent-based automation allows us to develop our own LLM or any agent that can integrate AI with standard automation, making decisions autonomously and yielding better results instead of relying on a time-consuming manual effort.

Even a non-technical person can easily understand what the features do and how to utilize them. I am not talking about going to the core level of automation, just being a citizen developer kind of thing. People can understand the features more easily, and as compared to others, Automation Anywhere has a better user experience.

In Automation Anywhere, while the user interface is top-notch and doesn't require improvements, the main issue I identify is that the cost of the enterprise-scale license and add-ons can be a barrier for small businesses. 

Additionally, users sometimes report performance challenges with large datasets and stability concerns due to frequent version updates. 

The basic features are acceptable, but advanced tools often require deeper technical expertise, which can slow adoption. Additionally, some users experience delays in customer support for complex issues. Despite these challenges, Automation Anywhere remains a robust platform for organizations seeking scalable and intelligent automation, and refining these aspects could further enhance its accessibility and reliability.

I have been working with Automation Anywhere since 2021, so it has been four years.

I would rate stability an eight out of ten.

Regarding scalability, I would rate it an eight out of ten. It is being used in multiple departments.

Maintaining bots is an ongoing process, as creating a bot doesn't mean it's finished; we need to make improvements as processes change. Generally, this maintenance occurs quarterly or twice a month.

I evaluate their technical support as the best in the industry. However, there have been instances of delays in getting responses or proper resolutions. Nonetheless, they have the best technical support team, and we have not faced significant issues in this area aside from a few small instances.

Neutral

Currently, I mainly work with two tools: Power Automate and Automation Anywhere, and I see a significant difference in the user interface between them. Power Automate is more challenging to understand the features. Functionality-wise, there are big differences, but understanding the nature of the tool, how it works, what features it has, and finding specific actions for particular tasks is much easier with Automation Anywhere. It comes with many good features, though it does come with a price. Nevertheless, I find Automation Anywhere is a better option in terms of features compared to others. There are performance mismatches, especially concerning execution time, when comparing with other platforms. 

From our experience in POCs, we noted that document processing works better in UiPath with limited time, whereas Automation Anywhere has a longer execution time despite similar accuracy. This marked difference resonates when comparing these two industry-leading RPA platforms, where, while performance might differ, the features of Automation Anywhere appear unmatched.

Its deployment is complex on-premises. We need to have our own database. Cloud deployment is straightforward. Everything is handled by Automation Anywhere, so you don't need to worry at all. 

On-premises setup requires maintenance, whereas cloud deployments don't require maintenance. You don't have to worry about upgrades with cloud deployments, whereas an on-premises setup requires a few things. You need to consider hardware maintenance, especially if it's a bare metal infrastructure. In cloud scenarios, you only need to consider licensing and database maintenance.

Bot maintenance depends on the changes in the process.

In terms of pricing, it's not at all cheap, and that's a concern. The licensing cost is very high. While I don't know the exact prices of other tools, Microsoft offers the lowest pricing for its RPA platform compared to UiPath and Automation Anywhere.

The Co-Pilot helps increase productivity to some extent, as it functions similarly to an LLM. If we provide an input, it processes that and gives an output. To create automation, we simply need to tell Co-Pilot our requirements, expected input, and desired output. We can provide a use case or just a skeleton of an automation, and it essentially creates an end-to-end flow. However, we must customize it since we cannot straightaway use that automation and expect accurate results. We need to perform some adjustments before a proper end-to-end execution. I don't consider it a tool to rely on extensively at the moment, but it's an interesting tool.

I would recommend Automation Anywhere. It's the best in the industry in terms of functionality as well as user experience. The only drawback is the cost. It's not ideal for a small business. From the functionality, features, and scalability aspects, it is great. 

Overall, I would rate the solution as an eight out of ten.