Our most common use cases include using prefect tasks on the ECS agents.

The overall experience with ECS-Optimized Amazon Linux Support by SupportedImages is good because it delivers what we want and meets our requirements.

In my opinion, the ECS-Optimized Amazon Linux Support by SupportedImages can be improved by running faster. Our ECS takes about three minutes to actually load everything and then start running. This includes not just deploying, but ECS itself. If the whole experience could run faster, that would be great.

We have been using Linux for about two years.

They have not utilized the customer service and technical support.

Positive

Before selecting the ECS-Optimized Amazon Linux Support by SupportedImages, I considered using raw EC2 and EKS. However, since our team did not have much experience with EKS, we chose the simplest option, ECS.

My advice to any other organizations considering the ECS-Optimized Amazon Linux Support by SupportedImages is to think about how you log into it and plan for future changes from the start, rather than waiting for problems to arise. On a scale of one to ten, I rate this solution an eight.

My main use cases for ECS-Optimized Amazon Linux Support by SupportedImages involve building modeling for pricing in our insurance company.

The main features of ECS-Optimized Amazon Linux Support by SupportedImages are difficult to explain, but they are significant.

Implementing ECS-Optimized Amazon Linux Support by SupportedImages has reduced the amount of money we are spending.

I don't have expert knowledge about ways that ECS-Optimized Amazon Linux Support by SupportedImages could be improved to provide a solid answer.

Regarding a new version, I am unable to determine what kinds of features I would want to see.

The solution could be improved.

I have been using it for four years.

The deployment process has worked effectively for me so far, as it was easy to implement.

Deployment was straightforward for me.

I faced initial challenges in understanding and acquiring the basic knowledge about implementation.

I assess the stability and reliability of ECS-Optimized Amazon Linux Support by SupportedImages as very highly available.

I have experienced downtime, crashes, and performance issues. For example, yesterday we wanted to use some ECS, and it was not available. In the past six months, there have been many problems accessing the region we are using.

ECS-Optimized Amazon Linux Support by SupportedImages scales effectively with the current needs of my organization, and I have good success with it.

I have not used any customer success or technical support yet.

Positive

I was not using another solution for the same thing; it was an on-premises basis.

My experience with setup costs and pricing indicates that it still costs lots of money, and we are trying to reduce the amount by saving.

I would describe my experience with deploying ECS-Optimized Amazon Linux Support by SupportedImages on Linux support as good. On a scale of one to ten, I rate this solution an eight out of ten.

I have used ECS-Optimized Amazon Linux Support by SupportedImages for almost a year.

I am working on a full stack project with a web server, a front end, and another server. We have two servers and a database.

Learning ECS-Optimized Amazon Linux Support by SupportedImages was not much of a challenge for me as I used Kubernetes in my past work, which was more challenging. Kubernetes is harder.

We use the container engine in Amazon, specifically ECR.

We have orchestration with containers in our workflow and it works fine.

Using ECS-Optimized Amazon Linux Support by SupportedImages provides better visibility into the issues.

It helps me do my job better because I have logs. I have CloudWatch automatically, and it is all in a single page. I can do the first deployment and run another one.

The integration of services such as ECS, CloudWatch, and logs is very important for my team's CI/CD pipeline. CloudWatch is very effective, helping us to see the logs better with all logs in one place. We do not use it to its full potential, but in the future, we will use more AWS products.

The UI could be better. It is simple, but it could be more simple. It is very good, but it can be excellent.

I have used ECS-Optimized Amazon Linux Support by SupportedImages for almost a year.

I have not had any interaction with the AWS customer support team. We do not have customers yet. We did not need to ask AWS directly. There is another team in our organization that manages the hub account.

Positive

I have used ECS on other platforms such as Azure before. Our DevOps team initially chose to use Kubernetes and then moved to OpenShift that runs Kubernetes. OpenShift supports IDF. Now, I moved to another team that uses AWS. There is ECS and EKS, but EKS is more complicated.

Learning and implementing Amazon ECS for deployment is challenging at first, as with any new technology. After learning it, the process was very fast. Understanding how it works to implement in the CD was simple. I saw samples from other people in my team who implemented it, making it easy to understand. In my team, two people implemented it, and I joined them sometimes. We are five members in the team.

I have seen a return on investment through time savings. Compared to more complicated products, it saves time. Because it is simple and we do not have extensive knowledge yet, it saves us more time than complicated solutions.

Working on this project is quite involved, similar to Kubernetes. It is straightforward to build the CD first, create the task definition, and then it runs.

It is very easy to use ECS-Optimized Amazon Linux Support by SupportedImages once you learn it, since it is on AWS and integrated into our system.

The overall process of learning ECS-Optimized Amazon Linux Support by SupportedImages took half a year.

I rate ECS-Optimized Amazon Linux Support by SupportedImages eight out of ten.