The soluton is used for full stack enterprise performance monitoring for our primarily cloud-based stack on AWS. We have implemented monitoring coverage using RUM for critical apps and websites and utilize APM (integrated with RUM) for full stack traceability.  

We use Datadog as our primary log repository for all apps and platforms, and the advanced log analytics enable accurate log-based monitoring/alerting and investigations. 

Additionally, we some advanced RUM capabilities and metrics to track and optimize client-side user experience. We track SLO's for our critical apps and platforms using Datadog.

We now have full-stack observability, which allows us to better understand application behavior, quickly alert users about issues, and proactively manage application performance.  

We've seen value by implementing observability coordinated across multiple applications, allowing us to track things like customer shopping and orders across multiple applications and services.  

For critical application launches, we've built dashboards that can track user activity and confirm users are able to successfully utilize new features, tracking user activities in real-time in a war-room situation.  

Datadog is our go-to tool for analyzing, understanding, and investigating application performance and behavior.

APM accurately tracks our service performance across our ecosystem. RUM gives us client-side performance and user experience visibility, and the rate of new features implemented in the Digital Experience area recently has been high. Log analytics give us a powerful mechanism for error tracking, research, and analysis.  

Custom metrics that we've created allow us to track KPIs in real-time on dashboards. All of these have proven valuable in our organization.  Additionally, Datadog product support teams are responsive and have provided timely support when needed.

Agent remote configuration should be provided/improved and streamlined, allowing for config changes/upgrades to be performed via the portal instead of at the host.   

Cost tracking via the admin portal is a bit lacking, even though it has gotten better.  I'm looking for usage trends (that drive cost) across time and better visibility or notifications about on-demand charges.  

Network device and performance monitoring could be improved, as we've faced some limitations in this area.  

The Datadog usage-based cost model, while giving us better transparency, is difficult to follow at times and is constantly evolving.  

I've used the solution for three years.

Support has been responsive and helpful.  

Positive

Pricing is straightforward. That said, it's sometimes difficult to estimate usage volumes.

We evaluated Datadog and New Relic in detail and chose Datadog due to their straightforward and competitive pricing model, and their full coverage of monitoring features that we desired, and an easy-to-use UI.  

We use this solution for enterprise monitoring across a large number of applications in multiple environments like production, development, and testing. It helps us track application performance, uptime, and resource usage in real time, providing alerts for issues like downtime or performance bottlenecks. 

Our hybrid environment includes cloud and on-premise infrastructure. The solution is crucial for ensuring reliability, compliance, and high availability across our diverse application landscape.

Datadog has greatly improved our organization by centralizing all monitoring into one platform, allowing us to consolidate data from a wide range of sources. 

From infrastructure metrics and application logs to end-user experience and device monitoring, everything is now collected and displayed in one place. This has simplified our monitoring processes, improved visibility, and allowed for faster issue detection and resolution. 

By streamlining these operations, Datadog has enhanced both efficiency and collaboration across teams.

Synthetic testing is by far the most valuable feature in our organization. It’s highly requested since the setup process is both quick and straightforward, allowing us to simulate user interactions across our applications with minimal effort. 

The ease of configuring tests and interpreting the results makes it accessible even to non-technical team members. This feature provides valuable insights into user experience, helps identify performance bottlenecks, and ensures that our critical workflows are functioning as expected, enhancing reliability and uptime.

One area where the product could be improved is Application Performance Monitoring (APM). While it's a powerful feature, many in our organization find it difficult to fully understand and utilize to its maximum potential. 

The data provided is comprehensive, yet it can sometimes be overwhelming, especially for those who are less familiar with the intricacies of application performance metrics. 

Simplifying the interface, offering clearer guidance, or providing more intuitive visualizations would make it easier for users to extract valuable insights quickly and efficiently.

I've used the solution for four years.

The solution is very stable. Issues happen once or twice a year and are usually solved before we have any real impact on the service.

Scalability has never been a bottleneck for us; we've never felt any issues here.

Support is slow at the beginning, however, they are much better and responsive now.

Positive

Datadog offered the most consolidated approach to our monitoring needs.

This was a migration project, so it was rather complex.

We implemented the solution with our in-house team.

I'd recommend new users look down the road and decide on at least a three-year plan.

We evaluated AppDynamics and Dynatrace.

We have multiple nodes integrated into our Azure infrastructure and our AKS clusters. These nodes are integrated with traces (as APM hosts).

We also have infrastructure Hosts integrated to see the metrics and the resources of each hosts mainly for Azure VMs and AKS nodes. Additionally, we also have hosts from our VMs in Azure which act as Activemq and we integrate them as messaging queues to show up in the Activemq dashboard.

We have recently added Activemq as containers in the AKS and we are also integrating those as messaging queues to show up in the Activemq dashboard integration 

Logs are great. Having all services with different teams sending the logs to Datadog and having all logs in the same place is very helpful for us to understand what is going on in our app; filtering of the logs a huge help and adding special custom filters is easy, filters are fast. Documentation is better than average, with little room for improvement.

Dashboards are simple, and monitors are very easy to configure and get notified if something is wrong.

With the aggregated logs, we can now see logs from other systems and identify problems in other areas in which we had no visibility before.

Dashboards are the most valuable. We need the observability. We have given the dashboards to a dedicated team to monitor them off working hours and they are reporting whatever they see going red. This helps us since people without any knowledge can understand when there is a problem and when to react and when to inform others by simply looking if the monitor (showing the dashboards) turns up red. 

Traces being connected to each other and seeing that each service is connected through one API call is very helpful for us to understand how the system works.

The monitors need improvement. We need easier root cause analysis when a monitor hits red. When we get the email, it's hard to identify why the trigger has gone red and which pod exactly is to blame in a scenario where the pod is restarting, for example.

Prices are a very difficult thing in Datadog. We have to be very mindful of any changes we make in Datadog, and we are a bit afraid of using new features since, if we change something, we might get charged a lot. For example, if we add a network feature to our nodes, we might get charged a lot simply by changing one flag, even though we are only going to use one small feature for those network nodes. However, due to the fact that we have more than 50 nodes, all of the nodes will be charged for the feature of "Network hosts".

This leads us to not fully utilize the capabilities of Datadog, and it's a shame. Maybe we can have a grace period to test features like a trial and then have datadog stop that for us to avoid paying more by mistake.

I've used the solution for five years.

The solution is stable enough. We found it to be down only a few times, and it's reasonable.

The solution offers very good scalability. When we added more logs and more hosts, we did not notice any degradation in the service.

Support is very good. They answer all of our questions, and with a few emails, we get what we need

Positive

We previously used Elastic. We had to set up everything and maintain it ourselves.

Datadog has very good support and it is not so complicated to set up.

We set up the solution in-house. We integrated everything on our own.

We found the product to be very valuable.

I'd advise others to start small and then integrate more stuff. Be mindful when using Datadog.

We evaluated Splunk and ELK.

Be careful of the costs. Set up only the important things.

We monitor our multiple platforms using Datadog and post alerts to Slack to notify us of server and end-user issues. We also monitor user sessions to help troubleshoot an issue being reported. 

We monitor 3.5 platforms on our Datadog instance, and the team always monitors the trends and Dashboards we set up. We have two instances to span the 3.5 platforms and are currently looking to implement more platform monitoring over time. The user session monitoring is consistent for one of these platforms. 

Datadog has improved our response time and cost-efficiency in bug reporting and server maintenance. We're able to track our servers more fluidly, allowing us to expand our outreach and decrease response time. 

There are many different ways that Datadog is used, and we monitor three and a half platforms on the Datadog environment at this time. By monitoring all of these platforms in one easy-to-use instance, we're able to track the platform with the issue, the issue itself, and its impact on the end user. 

The server monitoring, service monitoring, and user session monitoring are extremely helpful, as they allow us to be alerted ahead of time of issues that users might experience. More often than not, an issue is not only able to be identified, but solved and released before an end user notices an issue. 

We are currently using this as an investigative tool to notice trends, identify issues, and locate areas of our program that we can improve upon that haven't been identified as pain points yet. This is another effective use case. 

I would like to see a longer retention time of user sessions, even if by 24 to 48 hours, or even just having the option to be configurable. By doing this, we're enabled to store user sessions that have remained invisible for a long time, and identify issues that people are working around. 

I would also like to see an improvement in the server's data extraction times, as sometimes it can take up to ten minutes to download a report for a critical issue that is costing us money. Regardless, I am very happy with Datadog and love the uses we have for the program so far.  

I've used the solution for more than four years.

We did not previously use a different solution. 

Our primary use cases include:

• Alert on errors customers encounter in our product. We've set up logs that go to slack to tell us when a certain error threshold is hit.
• Investigate slow page load times. We have pages in our app that are loading slowly and the logs help us figure out which queries are taking the longest time.
• Metrics. We collect metrics on product usage.
• Session replays. We watch session replays to see what a user was doing when a page took a long time to load or hit an error. This is helpful.
  

It's helped us find bugs that customers are experiencing before they're reported to us. Sometimes, customers don't report errors, so being able to catch errors before they're reported helps us investigate before other users find errors

Datadog has helped us investigate slow page loading times and even see the specific queries that are taking a long time to load

Logging lets us see the context around an error. For example, see if a backend service had an error before it surfaced on the frontend.

Dashboards are helpful for reviewing occasionally to get a higher-level overview of what's happening.

The most valuable aspects include: 

• Logging. Being able to view detailed logs helps debug issues.
• Session replays. They are helpful for seeing what a customer was doing before they saw an error or had a slow page load
• Alerting. This is an important part of our on-call process to send alerts to slack when an error threshold is crossed. Alerts/monitors are easy to configure to only alert when we want them to alert.
• Dashboards. It's helpful to pull up dashboards that show our most common errors or page performance. It's a good way to see how the app is performing from a birds-eye-view.

The UI has a lot going on. It should be simpler and have a better way to onboard someone new to using Datadog.

The log querying syntax can be confusing. Usually, I filter by finding a facet in a log and selecting to filter by that facet - but I'm not sure how to write the filter myself

The monitor/alert syntax is also somewhat hard to understand.

Overall, it should be easier to learn how to use the product while you're using the product. Perhaps tooltips or a link to learn more about whatever section you're using.

I've used the solution for two years.

We did not previously use a different solution.

We did not evaluate other options. 

We use the solution for logs, infrastructure metrics, and APM. We have many different teams using it across both product and data engineering.

The solution has improved our observability by giving us rapid log search, a correlation between hosts/logs/APM, and tons of features in one website.

I enjoy the rapid log search. It's such a pleasure to quickly find what you're looking for. The ease of graph building is also nice, and MUCH easier than Prometheus.

It is far too easy to run up huge unexpected costs. The billing model is not flexible enough to handle cases where you temporarily have thousands of nodes. It is not price effective for monitoring big data jobs. We had to switch to open-source Grafana plus Prometheus for those.

It would be cool to have an open telemetry agent that automatically APM instruments everything in the next release.

I've used the solution for three years.

I'd rate the stability ten out of ten.

I'd rate the scalability ten out of ten.

We did not previously use a different solution.

The setup is very straightforward. Users just install the helm chart, and boom, you're done.

We handled the setup in-house.

Be careful about pricing. Make sure you understand the billing model and that there are multiple billing models available. Set up alarms to alert you of cost overruns before they get too bad.

We've never evaluated other solutions.

It's a great product. However, you have to pay for quality.

We use the product for instrumentation, observability, monitoring, and alerting of our system. 

We have multiple environments and a variety of pieces of infrastructure including servers, databases, load balancers, cache, etc. and we need to be able to monitor all of these pieces, while also retaining visibility into how the various pieces interact with each other. 

Tracing data between components and user interactions that trigger these data flows is particularly important for understanding where problems arise and how to resolve them quickly.

It provides a lot of options for integrations and tooling to observe what is happening within the system, making diagnosis and triage easier/faster. 

Each user can set up their own dashboards and share them with other users on the team. We can instrument monitors based on various patterns that we care about, then notify us when an event triggers an alert with platforms such as Slack or PagerDuty. 

Our ability to rapidly become aware of problems focused on the symptoms being observed and entry points into the tool to rapidly identify where to investigate further is important for our team and our users.

The most valuable aspects of the solution include log search to help triage specific problems that we get notified about (whether by alerts we have configured or users that have contacted us), APM traces (to view how user interactions trace through the various layers of our infrastructure and services to be able to reproduce and identify the source of problems), general performance/system dashboards (to regularly monitor for stability or deviation), and alerting (to be automatically informed when a problem occurs). We also use the incident tools for tracking production incidents.

In some ways, the tool has a pretty steep learning curve. Discovering the various capabilities available, then learning how to utilize them for particular use cases can be challenging. Thankfully, there is a good amount of documentation with some good examples (more are always welcome), and support is very helpful. 

While DataDog has started adding more correlation mapping between services and parts of our system, it is still tricky to understand what is the ultimate root cause when multiple views/components spike. Additionally, there are lots of views and insights that are available but hard to find or discover. Some of the best ways to discover is to just click around a lot and get familiar with views that are useful, but that takes time and isn't ideal when in the middle of fighting a fire.

I've used the solution for about four years.

It seems stable.

It seems to scale well. Performance for aggregating or searching is usually very fast.

Technical support is helpful and pretty responsive.

Positive

We did not use a different solution. 

It's hard to say what ROI would be as I have not managed our system without it to compare to.

I don't manage licensing.

We did not evaluate other options. 

It's a great tool with new features and improvements continuously being added. It is not simple to use or set up, however, if you have the right personnel, you can get a lot of value from what DataDog has to offer.

Internally our primary usage of Datadog pertains around APM/tracing, logging, RUM (real user monitoring), synthetic testing of service/application health and state, overall general monitoring + observability, and custom dashboards for aggregate observability. We also are more frequently leveraging the more recent service catalog feature.

We have several microservices, several databases, and a few web applications (both external and internal facing), and all of these within our systems are contained within several environments ranging from dev, sit, eat, and production.

Datadog has had a massive impact on our department. Before, we had loose logging dumped into a sea of GCP logs with haphazard custom solutions for traceability between logs and network calls. Datadog has helped standardize and normalize our processes around observability while providing fantastic tools for aggregating insight around what is monitored regularly, all wrapped in an easy-to-use UI.

Additionally, a range of types of users exist within our department, each with its own positive impact on Datadog. DevOps leverages it to easily manage infra, developers leverage it to easily monitor/debug services and applications, and business leverages it for statistics.

Personally I've found the RUM (real user monitoring) to be above and beyond what I've worked with before. Client-side monitoring has always been on the short end of the stick but the information collected and ease of instrumentation provided by Datadog is second to none.

Having a live dynamic service map is also one of my favourite features; it provides real-time insights into which services/applications are connected to which.

We are also investigating the new API catalog feature set, which I believe will provide a high-value impact for real-time documentation and information about all of our shared microservices that other dev teams can use.

In production, we intend to use trace IDs generated by RUM to attach to support tickets when a user experiences a traceable network error, and we want to display this trace ID to the user so if they were to contact us about a specific issue, they can provide us an exact ID displayed to them back to us. Currently, this is not possible out-of-the-box client-side without inventing our own solution for capturing these trace IDs, such as shimming the native fetch or returning the ID from the service response.

I've used the solution for approximately two years across our department and around a year or so of it being used practically and fully integrated into our systems.

Aside from one very brief bad update from the Datadog team around RUM where they broke the native 'fetch' for node in an update to RUM (which was resolved quickly) as it used to -- and may still -- modified the global 'fetch'; Datadog as a whole solution has been highly stable.

It's easy to implement and scale provided a there's a solid IaC solution in place to integrate across your system.

The Datadog support team is prompt and helpful when tickets have been submitted from our end. When their support team have been unsure, they've properly reached out internally to the relevant SME to help answer any questions we've had prior.

Positive

I've personally dabbled with some other open-source observability and monitoring solutions; however, prior to Datadog, our department did not have any solutions other than log dumps to GCP.

The initial setup was straightforward from my own experience, helping integrate within the application and service levels; however, our DevOps team handled most of the infra process with minimal complaints.

We handled the solution in-house.

I personally am not involved in the decision around costing; however, I am aware that when we first set up Datadog, we explicitly configured our services/applications to have a master switch to enable Datadog integration so that we can dynamically enable/disable targeted environments as need due to the costs being associated on a per service basis for APM/logging/etc.

I was not involved in the decision-making regarding the evaluation of other options.

I highly recommend Datadog, and I would explore it for my own individual projects in the future, provided the cost is within reason. Otherwise, I would highly recommend it for any medium-to-large-sized org.

We use the solution for monitoring microservices in a complex AWS-based cloud service.  

The system is comprised of about a dozen services. This involves processing real-time data from tens of thousands of internet connected devices that are providing telemetry. Thousands of user interactions are processed along with real-time reporting of device date over transaction intervals that can last for hours or even days. The need to view and filter data over periods of several months is not uncommon.  

Datadog is used for daily monitoring and R&D research as well as during incident response.

The query filtering and improved search abilities offered by Datadog are by far superior to other solutions we were using, such as AWS CloudWatch. We find that we can simply get at the data we need quicker and easier than before. This has made responding to incidents or investigating issues a much more productive endeavour. We simply have less roadblocks in the way when we need to "get at the data". It is also used occasionally to extract data while researching requirements for new features.

Datadog dashboards are used to provide a holistic view of the system across many services. Customizable views as well as the ability to "dive in" when we see someting anomalous has improved the workflow for handling incidents.    

Log filtering, pattern detection and grouping, and extracting values from logs for plotting on graphs all help to improve our ability to visualize what is going on in the system. The custom facets allow us to tailor the solution to fit our specific needs.

There are some areas on log filtering screens where the user interface can take some getting used to. Perhaps having the option for a simple vs advanced user interface would be helpful in making new or less experienced users comfortable with making their own custom queries.

Maybe it is just how our system is configured, yet finding the valid values for a key/value pair is not always intuitively obvious to me. While there is a pop-up window with historical or previously used values and saved views from previous query runs, I don't see a simple list or enumeration of the set of valid values for keys that have such a restriction.

I've used the solution for one year.

The solution is very stable.

The product is reasonably scalable, although costs can get out of hand if you aren't careful.

I have not had the need to contact support.

Neutral

We did use AWS CloudWatch. It was to awkward to use effectively and simply didn't have the features.

We had someone experienced do the initial setup.  However, with a little training, it wasn't too bad for the rest of us.

We handled the setup in-house.

Take care of how you extract custom values from logs. You can do things without thought to make your life easier and not realize how expensive it can be from where you started.

I'm not aware of evaluating other solutions.

Overall I recommend the solution. Just be mindful of costs.

We utilize Datadog to monitor both some legacy products and a new PaaS solution that we are building out here at Icario which is Micro-Service arch. 

All of our infrastructure is in AWS with very few legacies being rackspace. For the PaaS we mainly just utilize the K8s Orchestrator which implements the APM libraries into services deployed there as well as giving us infra info regarding the cluster. 

For legacies, we mainly just utilize the Agent or the AWS integration. With APM in specific places. We monitor mainly prod in Legacy and the full scope in the PaaS for now.

Datadog has greatly improved the time needed to investigate issues. Putting everything into a single pane of glass. Allowing us to get ahead of infra/app-based issues before they affect customer experience with our products. 

Outside of that, the ease of management, deployment of agents, integrations etc. has greatly helped the teams. There isn't much leg work needed by the devs to manage or deploy Datadog into their stacks. This is with the use of Terraform, pipelines and the orchestrator. All in all, it has been an improvement.

The two most valuable aspects are the Terraform provider for Datadog and the K8s Orchestrator. People don't take that into account when buying into a tooling product like Datadog in this age where scalability, management, and ease of implementation is key. Other tools not having good IaC products or options is a ball drop. Orchestration for the tools agent is good. Not having to use another tool to manage the agents and config files in mutiple places/instances is a huge win!

A big problem with Datadog is the billing. They need to make the billing more user-friendly. I know it like the back of my hand at this point, yet trying to explain it to the C-suite as to why costs went up or are what they are is many times more complicated than it needs to be. I can't even say "why" due to of the lack of metadata tied to billing. For instance, with the AWS Integration Host ingestion, I cant say well this month THESE host got added and thats what caused cost to go up. The billing visibility really needs to be resolved!

I'd rate the solution for more than four years.

Datadog has always been extremely stable, with outages really only ever creating delays, never actual downtime of the service, which is amazing and impressive.

The solution is very scalable if implemented right and not on top of complicated architecture.

Support is excellent. They are always looking for a resolution, and a ticket is never left unresolved unless the feature just can't exist or isn't currently possible.

Positive

We did have New Relic, Datadog, Sumo Logic, Pingdom, and some other custom or third-party tooling. We switched because we wanted everything to be in a single pane and because Datadog is a better solution than the competitors.

For us, set-up is a mixed bag as we support legacy apps and architectures as well as a new microservice architecture. That being said, legacy is somewhat complex just due to the nature of how those apps stack and the underlying infra and configuration and setup. Microservice is a breeze and straight-forward for most of the out-of-the-box stuff.

Our Team of SRE Engineers, Platform Engineers and Cloud Engineers implemented the solution.

I can't really speak to ROI; however, from my perspective, we definitely get our money's worth from the product.

Users just just really need to make sure they stay on top of costs and don't let all of the engineers do as they please. Billing with Datadog can get out of hand if you let them. Not everything needs to be monitored.

We didn't really need to evaluate other options.