Selenium HQ is an automation tool for automating applications.

Selenium Grid in the Cloud
GridlasticExternal reviews
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Offers an effortless setup process with superior automation features for web applications
What is our primary use case?
How has it helped my organization?
Selenium HQ is primarily used for smoke tests, and its excellent stability allows such tests to be executed seamlessly. The solution helps in regression tests where certain scenarios need to be repeatedly set. Manual processing of regression tests is highly time-consuming, but using Selenium HQ can reduce the time effectively.
What is most valuable?
I believe Selenium HQ to be the best solution in the market for automating web applications.
What needs improvement?
There are some synchronization issues with Selenium HQ; often, the solution is unable to match the browser speed, which has led to poor results. Some mechanisms should be added to Selenium HQ to improve synchronization.
It's an open-source solution with regular updates, but previously, in the 3.14.0 version at our company, we had to setup the ChromeDrivers, but in the latest feature, it wasn't necessary as the solution got easily integrated into the cloud.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Selenium HQ for two to three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I will rate the stability an eight out of ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I would rate the scalability a seven out of ten. At our organization we have a team of five or six people who are using Selenium HQ for automation. The maintenance of the product is always costly and time-consuming. It's very difficult for anybody to understand the code in business logic for a third party, so in our company, we need to share our knowledge with the maintenance professional first.
How are customer service and support?
To know about any updates on Selenium HQ I use search engines like Google and then update my Selenium HQ version accordingly.
How was the initial setup?
It's an effortless process to setup Selenium HQ. As part of the installation process, the dependencies need to be downloaded and pasted into the XML file for auto-execution. The installation of the solution can be completed in a few seconds.
What other advice do I have?
In our organization, we use Atlas for IDE and Maven for Eclipse to copy the dependencies from the cloud, and the rest of the testing process is setup using a test engine.
For testing web applications using Selenium HQ, the panel application and test synchronization features have proven the most beneficial. Selenium HQ supports almost every project browser, like Edge, Firefox, and Chromium, for testing automation. I would definitely recommend Selenium HQ to others, it's a robust product for automating applications.
I would rate Selenium HQ as nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Supports diverse web technologies, but they could add more customization features for reporting
What is our primary use case?
We use the product for mobile and API testing purposes.
What is most valuable?
Selenium's open-source nature is a key advantage. Its extensive support for diverse web technologies. We can combine it with APM for mobile, API, and web testing.
What needs improvement?
They should leverage the tools for supporting Windows apps. Additionally, they could add more customization features for reporting.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using Selenium HQ as partners for nine years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The product is stable. However, it is impacted by the changes in UI. I rate the stability a seven out of ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We manage Selenium HQ for 20 customers. It is a scalable product and suitable for small to medium enterprises. It needs improvement in terms of supporting Windows devices.
I rate the scalability a seven or eight.
How are customer service and support?
It is an open-source solution, and thus, we do not receive direct support services. We refer to relevant documentation and community articles to resolve most issues.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup for mobile app testing, especially when installing simulators, is complicated. Configuring simulators for Android and iOS platforms is time-consuming due to trial and error. Setting it up for mobile automation takes approximately one to two weeks. However, for web automation, the process is comparatively straightforward. It takes less than an hour to complete.
I rate the process a seven out of ten.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
It is an open-source solution.
What other advice do I have?
It's crucial for technicians to thoroughly evaluate whether the solution aligns with the end-to-end application needs, especially considering the complexity of enterprise applications. For leveraging features like ERP integration or mobile testing, it is better to understand the compatibility and support for specific devices.
I rate Selenium HQ a seven out of ten.
The solution has multiple plug-ins and can be used to create automated scripts
What is our primary use case?
I use Selenium HQ to create automated scripts for automated applications.
What is most valuable?
Since Selenium HQ has multiple plug-ins, we can use it with multiple tools and multiple languages.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I rate Selenium HQ a nine out of ten for stability.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I rate Selenium HQ a nine out of ten for scalability.
How was the initial setup?
The level of ease to set up Selenium HQ is medium. You need to have experience in order to do the initial setup.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Selenium HQ is a free, open-source solution.
What other advice do I have?
Selenium HQ is deployed on-cloud in our organization.
Overall, I rate Selenium HQ a nine out of ten.
An easy-to-use, customizable and open-source solution for the automation of functional test cases
What is our primary use case?
We use Selenium HQ for the automation of functional test cases.
What is most valuable?
The tool is easy to use and log in with respect to other tools. It is open-source. We can customize the product. I also like its security.
What needs improvement?
When we upgrade the version, some features are missing. I want the product to include some AI capabilities.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using the product for 11 years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Selenium HQ is very stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution is scalable, and we have around 9,000 users for the product.
How are customer service and support?
The tool's support is good, and they resolve issues nicely.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I have been using the open-source version.
What other advice do I have?
You need to be aware of Selenium HQ's architecture. I rate it a ten out of ten.