Our primary use case for Loadbalancer.org is on the presale point for clients who use the solution for balancing loads.
Load Balancer Enterprise ADC
Loadbalancer.org | 8.13.2Linux/Unix, Other LBOS-7 - 64-bit Amazon Machine Image (AMI)
External reviews
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Load management and balancing efficiency that's flexible
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
The most valuable features of Loadbalancer.org are related to its load balancing capabilities.
What needs improvement?
There is room for improvement in Loadbalancer.org in certain areas.
For how long have I used the solution?
For a significant period of time, I have had experience with Loadbalancer.org at the presale point.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Loadbalancer.org is stable. I have not encountered any bugs or glitches while working with it.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
When it comes to scalability, Loadbalancer.org is flexible.
How are customer service and support?
Technical support from Loadbalancer.org is satisfactory.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup of Loadbalancer.org can be challenging.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Pricing of Loadbalancer.org is something to consider.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
For bigger organizations, I would recommend considering other solutions like Radware.
What other advice do I have?
I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.
Helps prevent server overload by distributing the load across multiple servers, ensuring stability and enhancing security
What is our primary use case?
We're working on a project where our customers use HJ. We utilize their load balancer to evenly distribute the data load between multiple servers, ensuring that one server doesn't become overloaded.
How has it helped my organization?
Since I'm relatively new to the load-balancing scene, my current focus is primarily on data load-balancing.
What is most valuable?
If all the data traffic is directed to a single server, it can become overwhelmed. Load balancing helps us distribute both incoming and outgoing data loads evenly among the servers, preventing overload on a single server.
What needs improvement?
We could enhance the security aspects of the load balancer. For instance, when data passes through the load balancer, it could potentially include sensitive files or trade-related data. It would be beneficial to have additional features that help identify and protect against any unauthorized access or file leakage.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using it for past two months.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is scalable and I would rate it an eight out of ten.
How are customer service and support?
We're not currently using it because I've been testing it for about a month, and so far, everything seems fine.
How was the initial setup?
The choice of environment depends and specific needs and requirements. The setup process for the testing phase typically takes me around 30 minutes to an hour. It involves installing the tool and entering necessary information like SSL details. The staffing requirement depends on the project's size, with a small-scale solution typically requiring only one person to manage. I would rate it seven out of ten.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
So far, I would rate it around a five out of ten.
What other advice do I have?
Loadbalancer.org is highly valuable for organizations dealing with extensive file transfers. It helps prevent server overload by distributing the load across multiple servers, ensuring stability and enhancing security.
I would rate it an eight out of ten.
Very pleased customer, the product fulfiles our demands
LoadBalancer is useful
Very responsive pre-sales support
I had a complex load balancing requirement that required possible kernel changes and even though we never managed to find a match, their attention to my needs were exceptional. I will certainly consider them again in the future. I gave them five stars just effort.