Cursor

What do you like best about the product?

Code generation, debug issues and ask questions about your project

What do you dislike about the product?

a bit expensive and some times it took more token then required

What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?

It wrote a complete code of live activity in my swiftui project with actions and response

What do you like best about the product?

What I like most about Cursor is that it feels like an IDE first and an AI tool second, which means I'm the guy in the chair. The AI is deeply integrated into the development workflow instead of feeling like a separate chatbot. Features like editing across multiple files, understanding the codebase context and making targeted changes save a lot time compared to constantly copying code back and forth.

I also appreciate that cursor doesn't try to replace the developer. It speeds up repetitive work, helps me navigate unfamiliar code, and lets me stay focused on solving the actual problem. It strikes a good balance between automation and keeping me in control, which makes it something i can use throughhout the day rather than occasionally

What do you dislike about the product?

Sometimes the AI makes broad changes when i want a small, targeted edit. It can also lose context in very large or complex codebases.

Occasionally, the suggested code looks correct but misses subtle project specific details. I would also like more transparency into why it chooses edits or approaches

What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?

Cursor reduces the time spent on repetitive coding tasks like refactoring, debugging and boilerplate generation.

It understands the project context, so I spend less time explaining my code.

This lets me stay focused on solving problems instead of switching between tools.

As a result, I'm able to build features faster and maintain better development flow.

What do you like best about the product?

That the AI is embedded in the core of the editor and not attached with a side widget. The autocomplete with Tab is super fast and being able to launch refactorings that affect multiple files at once from Composer saves you a lot of time. Being a fork of VS Code, the learning curve is zero; you open your workspace, it indexes the project, and you're working from the first minute.

What do you dislike about the product?

RAM consumption gets spammed quite a bit when indexing large repositories, and sometimes the credit system falls short if you push Composer hard daily. It would also be cool if the context management allowed for a bit more manual fine-tuning of the files to ignore.

What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?

It takes the heavy carpentry off my shoulders: writing repetitive code, assembling types, and searching for documentation. By indexing the entire project, I can request refactorings that touch multiple files at once without having to manually copy and paste context. In the end, it translates into developing much faster and focusing on logic and architecture instead of wasting time on mechanical tasks.

Regarding integrations, being a direct fork of VS Code, you can import all your extensions, themes, and previous configuration with a click, and it connects very well with GitHub/GitLab repositories and external documentation through the option to add custom docs. In terms of ROI, the impact is immediate: with the monthly subscription, you recover those work hours in the first few days of use just with the time you save from writing repetitive code and migrating files.

In terms of support and onboarding, the curve is flat. The onboarding literally takes two minutes because it brings all your VS Code configuration at once, without having to relearn shortcuts or reinstall tools. On the support side, the community in its forum is super active and they release updates almost every week, fixing bugs and incorporating the latest models as they come out, so you never get stuck with an obsolete version.

What do you like best about the product?

I use Cursor for coding HTML apps and Android/iOS apps, including Whisper translation apps. I like that it's really clean and pro. It offers a large range of models. I like the model composer because it's fast. The initial setup was easy and fast.

What do you dislike about the product?

I don't like that you hit your monthly limits in an hour. The rate limits are a big issue, and I think increasing them would really help. Also, even though Cursor is popular, I felt that Antigravity was better.

What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?

I use Cursor for coding HTML and mobile apps. It offers a large range of models.

What do you like best about the product?

İ really like Cursor's quota because, thanks to its own models and the agreements it has made with xai, the models hardly use up my plan's quota. i'm pleased with how well it uses the agent tools. i like the composer 2.5 model because it's really great and very affordable. it offers me a lot of productivity on a budget of around $20. i think the single monthly quota system is great.

What do you dislike about the product?

I find the chat history reappearing annoying even after I've deleted them, and I think the code editor optimization is poor, it's even terrible. I constantly deal with deleting chats for no reason, and it slows down significantly when opening long folders, unlike Visual Studio Code which is really fast.

What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?

Cursor offers me great productivity with minimal costs, but I'm frustrated with the persistent deleted chat history and the poor code editor optimization.