Cursor

What do you like best about the product?

It has one of the cleanest UIs, with less cognitive overload. It’s a delight to use.

What do you dislike about the product?

Honestly, I can’t really think of anything to add. It’s good.

What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?

It is giving an enviroment for me to code

What do you like best about the product?

The best about Cursor is its AI coding capabilities

What do you dislike about the product?

The cursor requires detailed explanation otherwise the solution provided by cursor is not accurate.

What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?

The problem that cursor solving is pair programming, troubleshooting, debugging.

What do you like best about the product?

Since we get the help of AI to write our codes, I feel that it is helpful for me to find my mistakes. Everyday I use it to write my codes and make new websites. In terms of prices, we have to pay to use it. The UI is pretty simple to use too. The performance is amazing as mentioned since it is easy to write the commands. I have never asked for support on the app, but I guess it is better to ask them if we can since they might help sometime. I have connected this cursor to VSC (Visual studio code) to write my school codes. This supports me in my summative too.

What do you dislike about the product?

There is nothing that I dislike about cursor, but I guess it is better to make it free since not a lot of people can buy it. It was free before.

What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?

Cursor solves problems like fixing the codes that are not proper and gives me NEW codes to put in to make it better.

What do you like best about the product?

I really like Cursor's AI code generation because it automatically generates all the code for me, including complete functions, classes, and entire files without me having to type everything manually. It understands my project structure, which is top-notch. The detailed step-by-step instructions for setting up development and production environments save a lot of manual steps, especially for junior developers. It has significantly reduced the time for MVP creation from weeks to days and eliminated the need to write boilerplate code manually. Cursor is also great for generating 70-80% of the MVP code without manual typing, handling tasks like database schema, API endpoints, and authentication. This has saved us about twenty to thirty hours per week per person on routine coding tasks. Cursor generated the entire project structure, including database connections, API routes, and frontend components, in just one session. It makes our jobs easier by providing clear instructions on installing databases, APIs, and dependencies, significantly reducing the learning curve.

What do you dislike about the product?

While Cursor is excellent, there are some areas that could be improved. The AI becomes less helpful for fine-tuning complex customizations. It generates great initial code but struggles with advanced features, making more errors. Its performance can be inconsistent, sometimes perfect, other times producing broken or insufficient results. This inconsistency makes it unreliable for critical production issues. Additionally, Cursor needs to improve context retention to avoid breaking what’s already built, as it often makes errors that need constant context clarification to prevent mistakes. It still requires human oversight and assistance for debugging.

What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?

Cursor reduces development time drastically, automating code generation and MVP setup, and cutting weeks to days. It simplifies code writing, creates project structures and environment setups swiftly, freeing me to focus on business logic, significantly reducing the learning burden and manual coding hours.

What do you like best about the product?

I like that Cursor is a simple tool that allows the use of LLMs very close to the codebase, and for a reasonable price, the number of tokens is generous. The interface is designed to work directly in the relevant files, which is very useful when the codebase becomes large: it is quick to find the functions to correct or improve. The initial installation was very simple.

What do you dislike about the product?

The context of LLM in "auto" mode is somewhat limited, so you need to know how to use the tool intelligently: optimize the requests while being aware of the memory limit.

What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?

Cursor allows me to be faster in development by effectively detecting bugs. The integration of LLMs near the codebase simplifies the process.