Sold by: Camunda
Deployed on AWS
Camunda enables organizations to orchestrate and automate end-to-end
business processes, AI agents, and human work to continuously
overcome complexity and increase efficiency.
4.5
Overview
For Camunda's Enterprise Plan, we offer customized pricing tailored to your organization's unique needs. To explore your personalized pricing options, please reach out to our sales team at partner@camunda.com or visit our contact page: camunda.com/contact.
Camunda empowers organizations to orchestrate and automate end-to-end business processes, including AI agents and human workflows. Designed for both business and IT teams, Camunda's robust orchestration platform delivers speed, scale, and control without sacrificing security, governance, or innovation. Leading companies like Goldman Sachs, Atlassian, Intuit, Deutsche Telekom, BNY Mellon, and Walmart trust Camunda to run their mission-critical processes.
The platform provides centralized visibility and governance across all processes-from manual tasks to AI-driven decisions. With Camunda, AI agents are managed under the same reliable process framework as other technologies, ensuring transparency and control at every step. This allows organizations to enforce security standards, streamline compliance, and confidently scale operations.
Camunda simplifies process modeling through support for BPMN and DMN standards, allowing business users to clearly communicate intent to developers. Its BPMN Copilot provides an intuitive design experience without requiring prior modeling expertise. Once built, the executable model serves as the foundation for development, enabling scalable and flexible solutions with minimal rework.
Camunda's capabilities extend to agent orchestration, RPA, document processing, human workflows, and seamless integration with existing systems through pre-built connectors and an open architecture. Its composable platform easily integrates with your current tools and legacy systems, supported by rich APIs, SDKs, and clear technical documentation.
The platform is cloud-native and horizontally scalable, offering high availability and resilience for both small and large-scale workloads. Camunda can orchestrate processes across teams and geographies, maintaining performance and reliability at enterprise scale.
What makes Camunda stand out is its focus on being composable, intelligent, open, collaborative, and scalable. It fits into your existing development ecosystem, supports real-time collaboration with business stakeholders, and delivers low-latency execution without bottlenecks-empowering organizations to adapt, grow, and innovate confidently.
Highlights
- Tame business process complexity across a range of people, AI agents, systems, and devices: Camunda is designed for integration with all of diverse endpoints that make up your end-to-end business processes, from agents to microservices to human tasks to legacy systems, and everything in between.
- Solve disconnects between business and IT: Deep collaboration between teams helps ensure business agility by drastically reducing the time it takes to implement and adapt processes. A shared process model and modeling language bridges the gap between software developers, low-code developers, business technologists, and business stakeholders.
- Break through infrastructure and technology limitations: Customize any process to fit the unique needs of your business instead of bending processes to fit closed and proprietary automation tooling. Scale up to meet business demand without sacrificing performance or resilience.
Details
Sold by
Categories
Delivery method
Deployed on AWS
New
Introducing multi-product solutions
You can now purchase comprehensive solutions tailored to use cases and industries.
Features and programs
Buyer guide
Gain valuable insights from real users who purchased this product, powered by PeerSpot.
Financing for AWS Marketplace purchases
AWS Marketplace now accepts line of credit payments through the PNC Vendor Finance program. This program is available to select AWS customers in the US, excluding NV, NC, ND, TN, & VT.
Pricing
Pricing is based on the duration and terms of your contract with the vendor, and additional usage. You pay upfront or in installments according to your contract terms with the vendor. This entitles you to a specified quantity of use for the contract duration. Usage-based pricing is in effect for overages or additional usage not covered in the contract. These charges are applied on top of the contract price. If you choose not to renew or replace your contract before the contract end date, access to your entitlements will expire.
Additional AWS infrastructure costs may apply. Use the AWS Pricing Calculator to estimate your infrastructure costs.
Dimension | Description | Cost/12 months |
|---|---|---|
Camunda Enterprise Plan | Custom pricing is available for Camunda Enterprise Plan, please reach out to Camunda for a custom plan. | $175,000.00 |
Dimension | Cost/unit |
|---|---|
Process Instances: A process instance is counted when you start a process | $175,000.00 |
Dimensions summary
This listing has two pricing dimensions under one contract. Process Instances bill by usage: you are charged each time you start a process. This scales directly with how many processes you run. The Camunda Enterprise Plan uses custom pricing set through the vendor, so you contact Camunda to build a plan for your needs. Together, the two options let you pay per process instance or arrange a tailored enterprise agreement. Pricing grows with process volume under the usage dimension, while the Enterprise Plan is negotiated based on your requirements.
Top-of-mind questions for buyers
A process instance is counted each time you start a process. Every process you launch adds one to your count. The charge scales directly with how many processes you run, so higher process volume means more instances billed.
They represent two ways to buy, not additive charges. Process Instances bill by usage, counting each process you start. The Camunda Enterprise Plan uses custom pricing arranged with Camunda for your requirements. You work with the vendor to determine which structure fits your deployment.
Camunda runs as a hosted service or on your own infrastructure using the same engine and APIs. The pricing dimensions here bill by process instance or through a custom Enterprise Plan. For details on how your chosen deployment maps to pricing, contact Camunda.
camunda.com+1
Helpful?
Vendor refund policy
Refund policy is defined in the EULA. Contact aws@camunda.com if you have any questions.
Custom pricing options
Request a private offer to receive a custom quote.
Legal
Vendor terms and conditions
Upon subscribing to this product, you must acknowledge and agree to the terms and conditions outlined in the vendor's End User License Agreement (EULA) .
Content disclaimer
Vendors are responsible for their product descriptions and other product content. AWS does not warrant that vendors' product descriptions or other product content are accurate, complete, reliable, current, or error-free.
Delivery details
Software as a Service (SaaS)
SaaS delivers cloud-based software applications directly to customers over the internet. You can access these applications through a subscription model. You will pay recurring monthly usage fees through your AWS bill, while AWS handles deployment and infrastructure management, ensuring scalability, reliability, and seamless integration with other AWS services.
Resources
Support
Vendor support
Number of support resources are available for Camunda users:
1. Technical Documentation: Access technical documentation at https://docs.camunda.io .
2. Community Forum: Engage in discussions about business process management and process automation and raise technical questions at https://forum.camunda.io .
3. Support Tickets: To submit a support ticket, visit https://support.camunda.com .
4. Advanced support SLAs, private classroom training, and consulting services are available for purchase.
AWS infrastructure support
AWS Support is a one-on-one, fast-response support channel that is staffed 24x7x365 with experienced and technical support engineers. The service helps customers of all sizes and technical abilities to successfully utilize the products and features provided by Amazon Web Services.
Similar products
Unlock the full potential of your business processes with our AWS and Camunda experts. Our team possesses very deep knowledge in the analysis, design, and implementation of processes on the Camunda platform and AWS projects.
Global trade volatility, evolving policies, and limited supply chain visibility are challenging organisational agility and compliance. Automating Letters of Credit (LC) processes offers a strategic response—codifying trade rules, enhancing compliance, and enabling real-time visibility. HCLTech, as a platinum Camunda partner, leverages Camunda 8’s agentic orchestration to power intelligent LC automation. This solution integrates autonomous AI agents, human oversight, and real-time process intelligence to deliver scalable, responsive, and trustworthy LC workflows for the digital era
Accelerate your Camunda 8 deployment on AWS with CapTech’s Camunda Deployment Accelerator (CDA). This proven methodology compresses the timeline from months to weeks, ensuring a rapid and seamless transition to a self-managed Camunda environment.
Observe your AWS environments in real-time with high-fidelity data that helps you find and fix problems before they impact users. Try it for free or pay monthly based on usage, with a single pricing metric for simplicity, to reduce costs and avoid unexpected charges.
Customer reviews
Paul Van Der Weijde
Workflow orchestration has supported complex enforcement processes and improves human task integration
Reviewed on Oct 15, 2026
Review from a verified AWS customer
What is our primary use case?
The use case we developed is for enforcers, so police and other enforcement type of organizations, and it's our embedded engine for process orchestration and workflow. We use all the BPMN and DMN functionality in the system.
We do not use the AI agent in Camunda yet. We are now moving from Camunda 7 to Camunda 8, and the first customers are on Camunda 8. First, we have to finish the migration for all customers with their processes from Camunda 7 to Camunda 8, and then we will also integrate AI in our solution combined with Camunda. I am uncertain if you refer to integration of AI in the processes or AI in the products of Camunda.
Camunda does not help us with end-to-end processes rather than running agents in isolation yet, but that is one of the advantages we already discussed with our customers. We first have to finish the migration for all customers.
What is most valuable?
My impressions of Camunda for orchestrating complex end-to-end business processes are very positive because we use it in quite complicated setups with a lot of business rules to combine validation and enrichment steps combined with user interaction. The scalability and complexity supported by Camunda are impressive, and the upgrade from Camunda 7 to 8 was particularly valuable. We were a late adopter because the functionality of Camunda 8 was not mature until about a year or one and a half ago, and now that we have adopted it, the scalability and integration possibilities are much better than Camunda 7.
The best features in Camunda are difficult to pinpoint, but for me, it is the seamless integration of services and human tasks. We can combine this and per customer decide what should be first. The possibility to integrate human tasks and services is what stands out to me, and it is a generic solution rather than something specifically about special tools. It is the whole concept that appeals to me.
Camunda works effectively with handling long processes. We have customers with very short processes of just a couple of seconds or a maximum of one or one and a half hours, and we also have customers with processes lasting two, three, or four months. Both scenarios are supported, but sometimes it is difficult for customers to have insight into all the statuses and tasks. We are now trying to build our own dashboard, which can be challenging when there are long running processes with many different tasks and statuses, especially since we cannot give customers direct access to Camunda dashboards in our multi-tenant environment.
What needs improvement?
Areas that have room for improvement in Camunda include the user interface. We moved from Camunda 7 to Camunda 8, and previously we had Camunda 7 Cockpit, and now we have Operate. The UI of Operate is less user-friendly. It may be a little more modern, but it is less user-friendly, so some insights are missed. The UI could be improved.
Another topic is something that should have been recently solved in Camunda 8, but in Camunda 7, we had a case management system based on Camunda, and we had our own identifiers in our system. It was easier in Camunda 7 to link these identifications, the business identification to the process identification, and in Camunda 8, this was not implemented until the 8.10 release. We really missed that feature, as it made it very difficult to embed and especially for debugging. The combination with the new Operate instead of Camunda 7 Cockpit made it difficult to find specific running processes.
The maintenance of Camunda is somewhat complex. Recently, we had to move from 8.8 to 8.9 or 8.10, and everything was broken, which cost us a lot of time to repair and revert. The complexity is particularly evident because of the architectural changes Camunda made when moving from Camunda 7 to Camunda 8. It took about three years to make Camunda 8 mature, and sometimes it seems they realized they made a wrong decision by switching to a completely different approach. It is not just a matter of pushing a button and installing it; it has a bigger impact than expected, which is indeed one of the downsides we recently faced.
The ability to observe and control processes at runtime, related to Operate, rates at a six in my assessment, so that could definitely be improved.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have approximately eight to ten years of experience using Camunda.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Regarding stability, I would rate Camunda at a seven.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Our clients are indeed enterprise-level organizations. For example, we work with Rijkswaterstaat, which manages all the routes and waterways in the Netherlands, and it is a large organization with 10,000 employees, but only a limited number of enforcers, about 200 to 300 users in this type of organization. In the City of Antwerp, we have 300 users, and at the Dutch Railways, we have 800 users, but approximately 10,000 persons work there overall, so it represents about 1% or half a percent of their total employees.
When it comes to scalability, Camunda is scalable, but sometimes it is not always clear how to improve it. Sometimes we reach the limit and have to decide what to extend; should it be memory or processor power? It is a puzzle to optimize in combination with the services. Overall, Camunda is scalable, but it is not as straightforward as one would hope.
How are customer service and support?
I would rate the technical support at an eight out of ten. They react promptly and the support is adequate.
What was our ROI?
When it comes to ROI, the question is tricky because we use it as an embedded software solution, so we should compare this only with using a BPMN tool of a competitor or building it ourselves. We do not have the advantages of the process improvements since we work with our customers to make it possible for them to improve their processes. Our customers are governmental organizations, so with fewer people, they can do more enforcement and receive more income from parking, but the problem is we do not receive the extra money. Since there are public tenders, the prices are always under pressure. We offer a solution with business process optimization, and the benefits are for our end customers. They pay maybe a little more than for our competitors, but they save millions, and we earn about 10,000 per year extra. That is the relation based on the public tender and the regulations in the governmental tender market.
The normal discussion for us is about the build or buy aspect, especially concerning Camunda, since we are an embedded software solution and should compare it only with using a BPMN tool of a competitor or building it ourselves. We do not have the advantages of the process improvements, and our customers can do more enforcement and receive more income, but we do not get the extra money. Public tenders put pressure on prices, meaning we provide optimization for customers while they save millions, and we only earn a small amount.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
My thoughts on the pricing are that the list price is expensive, but since we have limited use and do not use the user tasks because we create software around Camunda engine, the pricing for embedded is acceptable for us. It should not rise; it is just acceptable for us now. They should not raise the prices because otherwise, it becomes the build or buy discussion. Overall, I am happy with the current pricing.
What other advice do I have?
Regarding the deployment, we use on-premises infrastructure at AWS. We have our own installations, but it is hosted in our own AWS environment, so it is on-premises in the cloud.
In my organization, the number of specialists working with Camunda is very limited; I myself work more as the business process redesign person, and we have three developers.
My advice to others looking into Camunda is to do a proof of concept, specifically for the user tasks. The user task is the most significant cost factor in the pricing model. In Camunda 7, we used the user task intensively, but it was not clear that we were not allowed to use it according to our existing subscription. Be aware of the costs because they can rise if you reach the limit or thresholds. It is essential to think about all components in relation to your subscription, as it was one of our key findings in previous years. Camunda is easy to use, but you do receive the invoice at the end, and that can sometimes be the downside. I would rate Camunda an overall eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Shady Akl
Process automation has transformed complex onboarding and lending workflows and delivers clear ROI
Reviewed on Oct 07, 2026
Review provided by PeerSpot
What is our primary use case?
I have been using Camunda for five years. My use case involves BPMN and workflow automation for onboarding corporate customers and lending workflows.
Regarding AI agents or AI in Camunda, we are currently in the inception phase. It is not yet used in production, but we are in the architecture approval stage, so it is not yet live.
What is most valuable?
The best features and what I appreciate most about Camunda are the simplicity in using BPMN representations and the framework overall. Camunda provides excellent tools, including the modeler, web apps for application administration and process monitoring, and the ability to generate reports using Camunda Optimize. These are the main features we use and why we were attracted to Camunda.
Camunda is very capable of running complex orchestrations and end-to-end business processes. The lending use case is somewhat complex, and Camunda made it very easy and handy to implement.
Camunda's ability to observe and control processes at runtime is very good and perfect. All of these capabilities can be used in Camunda in production, allowing us to monitor and observe runtime processes.
Camunda handles long-running processes very well. We have processes that might be stuck for months, and Camunda works on them without any issues.
What needs improvement?
The latest feature is Process OS. The idea is very good, but it still needs more elaboration on how it operates and how it will help the business and technical aspects. This needs more demonstration because it is not easy to understand Process OS.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Camunda for almost five years.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Approximately 5,000 users use Camunda.
What was our ROI?
The return on investment I see is almost 40 to 50%, and I am looking forward to investing more.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Camunda is fairly priced at a mid-level. It is not cheap, and it is not that much expensive.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
When we started working with Camunda, we had a consultant who helped us compare Camunda with most of the solutions in the market. At that time, Camunda was the best choice due to the usability and simplicity it offered.
What other advice do I have?
Camunda is deployed as an on-premises solution. It was purchased directly through Camunda itself, not through a vendor or partner. Maintaining Camunda is easy and can be achieved in a straightforward way. I would recommend Camunda to others looking to implement this product, and they should consider doing a proof of concept. I would give this product a rating of 9 out of 10.
reviewer2906868
Intelligent document workflows have transformed and simplify complex banking processes
Reviewed on Oct 06, 2026
Review provided by PeerSpot
What is our primary use case?
My main use case for Camunda is intelligent document processing. I use Camunda for intelligent document processing in the banking business process around all kinds of documents, and it is used to orchestrate classification, extraction, and business decisions.
My impressions of Camunda for orchestrating complex end-to-end business processes are that it is a very good tool to handle the complexity of business cases.
What is most valuable?
The best features Camunda offers include high performance and excellent modeling capabilities.
The modeling experience stands out for me due to the interface, the respect for industry standards, and also the integration capabilities with templates of services named connectors.
Camunda has positively impacted my organization by simplifying business process management and improving time to market. We have reduced the code by 50% and improved time to market.
What needs improvement?
Camunda can be improved with current features and development that are interesting, such as process design using generative AI or agentic orchestration.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Camunda for four years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Regarding Camunda's AI capabilities, I consider its accuracy and reliability of output to be very reliable. It is a high-performance orchestration engine, and we have had very few production incidents over the span of a few years.
What other advice do I have?
Camunda is deployed in my organization as a private cloud. I use Red Hat OpenShift as the cloud provider for the private cloud deployment. My overall rating for Camunda is 10 based on the overall quality, performance, and vision.
Andrej Grimm
Workflow orchestration has accelerated financial processes and provides full end‑to‑end visibility
Reviewed on Oct 05, 2026
Review provided by PeerSpot
What is our primary use case?
Camunda is used for workflow digitalization, which I would call business process orchestration. I do use AI or AI agents with my people and systems, but not within Camunda as of now.
What is most valuable?
The best features of Camunda include the way it integrates into existing application landscapes and the stability. My thoughts on orchestrating complex end-to-end business processes with Camunda are definitely positive, as it can handle every process, especially within the financial context.
Camunda can orchestrate the systems we already run without forcing us to replace or migrate them, which is one of the major advantages I have mentioned. With Camunda, it works very well for long-running processes, so it keeps us updated with full status and visibility.
What needs improvement?
The area where we are struggling with Camunda is currently the Optimize module, which does not have all the features that we need for fully-fledged process analytics.
Regarding maintenance, I would say it is currently not so easy, especially since we do this on-premises and our IT team is struggling with migrating it to OpenShift.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working with Camunda since 2022, so for four years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
My thoughts on the stability of Camunda are that we do have downtimes, but they are usually not caused by Camunda, so I think the general stability is good. I would rate it a nine.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Currently, we have about 700 users using Camunda. Camunda is definitely scalable for our company and business needs, and I would rate it a ten.
How are customer service and support?
When I rate the technical support for Camunda from one to ten, I would give them an eight.
What was our ROI?
When it comes to return on investment for Camunda, regarding process lead time reduction, we see something between 50 to 80 percent easily. On average over all the processes that we have, I would say it is between 5 to 10 percent.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
My thoughts on the pricing of Camunda are that it is worth its price, with a touch towards expensive. On pricing, I would rate Camunda as a seven.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
In comparing Camunda with other vendors, we have not reassessed since we decided to go for Camunda, so we basically use it exclusively, making it difficult for me to answer.
What other advice do I have?
I can definitely recommend Camunda, especially within the financial industry. I would rate this review a nine overall.
Dumisani Zondi
Open standards have simplified process design and enabled flexible integration with existing skills
Reviewed on Oct 02, 2026
Review provided by PeerSpot
What is our primary use case?
I do not use Camunda agents personally, but I am aware that people within the organization have started using them.
What is most valuable?
I find it valuable that Camunda is built on open standards such as BPMN and connects openly with different models, agents, and frameworks, as it does not limit me in terms of skills. It allows for easier access to resources or people in the market, and it will be easier for them to learn from their past experiences. This makes things straightforward.
What needs improvement?
The areas in Camunda that have room for improvement are primarily the front-end capabilities. However, we had a discussion with Brandon, the Camunda founder, who highlighted that this is not his focus. I think if Camunda can improve the overall front-end capabilities, that will help them. They have also pushed for Camunda being able to extend its forms using different applications.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working with Camunda for two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Regarding stability, we have not had a solution running heavily in production, but so far, I would rate it as fairly stable. This is not a production environment; it is more of a QA prod environment. Although we do have a production environment, we do not have a solution running there, so I cannot rate it fairly based on production performance. Based on what we have tested, it is quite stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I would say that we are looking at having more than a thousand users using the solution.
I note that we have not tested scalability very much, as we do not have a product in production right now.
How are customer service and support?
I rate their technical support as a nine; it is good.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I find that pricing is not inexpensive based on the fact that enterprise applications can easily generate millions of process instances. Camunda charges per process instance, which is a constraint compared to other engines. It is different in that regard.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I compare Camunda with other solutions or vendors such as Pega, IBM, or Bizagi and find that technically, it is actually good and almost in the lead. However, the drawback is the two things I mentioned: the financial model of licensing or charging, and the front-end capabilities.
What other advice do I have?
I find that it is easy to maintain Camunda because we have already upgraded and patched it with ease, so it is quite straightforward and does not require days of planning and preparation.
Overall, I rate Camunda a score of eight.