
Overview
Full Stack Geocoding / Geoparsing for North America (USA or Canada - Forward & Reverse, Batch Geocode). Rest API (CSV, XML, Json and Jsonp)
Highlights
- Easy to set up on the instance of your choice.
- Unlimited Geocoding (Forward and Reverse) for USA and Canada (including full-text geoparsing).
- Very high geocoding coverage (over 99%) and accuracy (RoofTop and Interpolated results with high confidence score).
Details
Introducing multi-product solutions
You can now purchase comprehensive solutions tailored to use cases and industries.
Features and programs
Financing for AWS Marketplace purchases
Pricing
- ...
Dimension | Cost/hour |
|---|---|
c5.9xlarge Recommended | $1.30 |
t3a.xlarge | $0.90 |
r4.xlarge | $1.10 |
p2.xlarge | $1.00 |
p2.8xlarge | $1.50 |
r5.12xlarge | $1.40 |
m5n.4xlarge | $1.40 |
m5.2xlarge | $1.30 |
r4.8xlarge | $1.40 |
t3a.large | $0.80 |
Vendor refund policy
We do not currently support refunds, but you can cancel at any time.
How can we make this page better?
Legal
Vendor terms and conditions
Content disclaimer
Delivery details
64-bit (x86) Amazon Machine Image (AMI)
Amazon Machine Image (AMI)
An AMI is a virtual image that provides the information required to launch an instance. Amazon EC2 (Elastic Compute Cloud) instances are virtual servers on which you can run your applications and workloads, offering varying combinations of CPU, memory, storage, and networking resources. You can launch as many instances from as many different AMIs as you need.
Version release notes
- Performance Enhancements
- Accuracy
Additional details
Usage instructions
Access the server on http port 80. Instructions and examples are provided on that page as per the geocoder.ca/api specifications.
Resources
Vendor resources
Support
Vendor support
Please allow 24 hours
AWS infrastructure support
AWS Support is a one-on-one, fast-response support channel that is staffed 24x7x365 with experienced and technical support engineers. The service helps customers of all sizes and technical abilities to successfully utilize the products and features provided by Amazon Web Services.

Standard contract
Customer reviews
Accurate coordinates have transformed mapping tasks and significantly reduce project timelines
What is our primary use case?
I use Geocoder.ca most often when I need to find latitude and longitude coordinates for a particular region using a pin code. When I have a region name that belongs to the US or Canada, along with a place name and pin code, but I do not know the latitude and longitude for that particular region, I perform spatial mapping for that region by utilizing Geocoder.ca to get the latitude and longitude using the name of the region or the pin code.
What is most valuable?
Apart from fetching coordinates, I also use Geocoder.ca to verify the latitude and longitude for the particular region that I need to use. Getting the place latitude and longitude using the pin code or the area name, or seeing where that particular place belongs on the map, is one of the best features that I appreciate about Geocoder.ca.
When I try to fetch latitude and longitude from Google Maps or using other applications, I prefer the refresh rate and the response rate of Geocoder.ca because they provide the output for that particular place in the form of latitude and longitude within milliseconds.
I am currently utilizing the free version of Geocoder.ca, and I am confident that if I had a paid subscription with API access, I could accomplish tasks that take around thirty to fifty minutes with other APIs in just minutes. Since the main advantage is getting what I want within milliseconds, this definitely reduces the overall deadline of the project, and my productivity and efficiency will increase.
When I compare other tools, I was using some applications for the same use case that took around thirty minutes to one hour to fetch the latitude and longitude for the particular region. Now by using Geocoder.ca, I am able to get all the latitude and longitude for the region within five to ten minutes, showing a difference of twenty-five to thirty minutes. The productivity has increased to the point where the deadline of the project gets reduced by one to two weeks.
What needs improvement?
If Geocoder.ca could provide a free API for the current limitations, it could be helpful for those who have not purchased the product. I also think they can improve their user interface because the current applications have smaller text compared to what I prefer. I prefer the text to be written in a bigger format based on specific user requirements.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Geocoder.ca for the last six to seven months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I have not experienced any downtime or issues with Geocoder.ca.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I believe Geocoder.ca can handle large volumes of data because I have not seen any downtime while using it, so I do not believe it has any scalability issues.
How are customer service and support?
I have not reached out to customer support for Geocoder.ca. Should that point come, I am confident they will help me if I face any problems.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I was using Google Maps previously but switched out because the response time was greater compared to Geocoder.ca.
What was our ROI?
Regarding metrics, time saved is one key metric as I have mentioned, with a project deadline reduced by one to two weeks. Regarding money saved, I do not have much information about it, but I believe it has saved my organization money.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I do not have any information about pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Geocoder.ca, as this information is handled by others in my organization.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I have not used many applications apart from Geocoder.ca. I learned about it and directly started using it and found that I appreciated it, so that was the reason I have not explored any other tools.
What other advice do I have?
I would advise others looking into using Geocoder.ca to read about it and understand how to use their API if they are using paid subscriptions. Reading the documentation will be important to understand how to use their application. I rate this product eight point five out of ten.
Accurate coordinates have powered faster weather data integration for remote store locations
What is our primary use case?
I was using Geocoder.ca for around two months for a project at my current company. We were trying to work with weather stations and weather data for specific stores in countries like El Salvador, and we used Geocoder.ca to fetch the locations for those weather stations.
Because some of these weather stations were in quite remote locations, Geocoder.ca definitely helped me save time and speed up my development process by fetching the information that I needed. It was used for on-premises purposes as it was only needed for one-time fetching.
What is most valuable?
Geocoder.ca provides an easy-to-use API that programmatically allows for clear access and clear data fetching, which are my main use cases.
The documentation for Geocoder.ca is very clear, allowing me to accurately test my APIs using Postman, and the endpoints are also equally clear and made a lot of sense.
Geocoder.ca helped me move along and ship out location-based features faster. For countries that have sparse latitude and longitude data available, I am able to rely on Geocoder.ca to fetch that information.
What needs improvement?
If Geocoder.ca had a direct connection with weather stations, that would be very useful. Rather than just giving me coordinates, immediately providing me with weather data would be a helpful improvement. Other than that, it does the job quite accurately.
Adding more features than just plain coordinates would be beneficial, such as weather or other features that would make Geocoder.ca a ten for me.
For how long have I used the solution?
I was using Geocoder.ca for around two months for a project at my current company.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Geocoder.ca is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Geocoder.ca looks very scalable and seems to handle scalability quite well.
How are customer service and support?
I never had to deal with any customer support for Geocoder.ca because the library and results worked quite well.
What was our ROI?
Time was definitely saved with Geocoder.ca; however, it is tough to quantify exactly by how much.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Because I did not need a large amount of coordinates, I was able to get by with the free tier of Geocoder.ca, making it quite useful and impactful. However, going forward, if I get requirements from a different client, I am sure I will probably get to pricing and higher tiers.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I evaluated various weather station APIs before choosing Geocoder.ca; however, the coordinates that they were giving me were not matching up to the actual weather station itself and were off by a fair margin. Geocoder.ca's accuracy was what really impressed me.
What other advice do I have?
Geocoder.ca is a very good platform and it was giving accurate results; however, after consistent usage and client requirements, I did not need that level of detail and granularity, and hence I moved on from Geocoder.ca.
It is a good library. Geocoder.ca does the job that it is supposed to do and does it quickly, efficiently, and more importantly, accurately. When it comes to location, exact coordinates are extremely important, especially for my purpose, which was weather. I would rate this product an eight out of ten.
Accurate and Versatile, but
Geocoding was pretty accurate, on par with what you'd expect from Google Maps or ESRI. Lots of info returned on reverse geocoding. Forward geocoding and parsing of raw text was fine too.
A bit slow right off the bat. Using the test_performance.pl script that comes with it:
-bash-4.2$ /home/ec2-user/test_performance.pl
End test at Thu Nov 30 19:17:10 2017 (Test started at Thu Nov 30 19:08:02 2017, total time spent: 547.783696889877 seconds.)
198 requests were sent in parallel
Average response time was 2.76658432772665 seconds per request
Then tried the test again after a few minutes:
End test at Thu Nov 30 19:21:11 2017 (Test started at Thu Nov 30 19:21:06 2017, total time spent: 4.92717409133911 seconds.)
198 requests were sent in parallel
Average response time was 0.0248847176330258 seconds per request
So, it is slow at first, then picks up speed considerably. 0.02 seconds per query vs 2.7. (on a C8x8xlarge server)
Incredibly Slow
I appreciate that it works out of the box, but even on an r4.2xlarge instance it regularly takes 15-120s to geocode a structured address. SQS queue has been draining for days now.
Not very flexible
Very easy to use and install! But
Compared to the free MapQuest nominatim this was slower - although maybe it needed to churn longer to get through startup tasks? I ran 500+ queries and didn't see a significant speed increase - and much less willing to make a guess about vague addresses or assign PO Boxes to the city or zipcode centroid.